(Abbreviated) Kepler planet candidates require both spectroscopic and imaging
follow-up observations to rule out false positives and detect blended stars.
[...] In this paper, we examine a sample of 11 Kepler host stars with
companions detected by two techniques -- near-infrared adaptive optics and/or
optical speckle interferometry imaging, and a new spectroscopic deblending
method. We compare the companion Teff and flux ratios (F_B/F_A, where A is the
primary and B is the companion) derived from each technique, and find no cases
where both companion parameters agree within 1sigma errors. In 3/11 cases the
companion Teff values agree within 1sigma errors, and in 2/11 cases the
companion F_B/F_A values agree within 1sigma errors. Examining each Kepler
system individually considering multiple avenues (isochrone mapping, contrast
curves, probability of being bound), we suggest two cases for which the
techniques most likely agree in their companion detections (detect the same
companion star). Overall, our results support the advantage the spectroscopic
deblending technique has for finding very close-in companions (θ≲0.02-0.05") that are not easily detectable with imaging. However, we
also specifically show how high-contrast AO and speckle imaging observations
detect companions at larger separations (θ≥0.02-0.05") that are
missed by the spectroscopic technique, provide additional information for
characterizing the companion and its potential contamination (e.g., PA,
separation, Δm), and cover a wider range of primary star effective
temperatures. The investigation presented here illustrates the utility of
combining the two techniques to reveal higher-order multiples in known
planet-hosting systems.Comment: Accepted to AJ. 40 pages, 12 figure