Coordination languages simplify design and development of concurrent systems.
Particularly, exogenous coordination languages, like BIP and Reo, enable system
designers to express the interactions among components in a system explicitly.
In this paper we establish a formal relation between BI(P) (i.e., BIP without
the priority layer) and Reo, by defining transformations between their semantic
models. We show that these transformations preserve all properties expressible
in a common semantics. This formal relation comprises the basis for a solid
comparison and consolidation of the fundamental coordination concepts behind
these two languages. Moreover, this basis offers translations that enable users
of either language to benefit from the toolchains of the other.Comment: In Proceedings ICE 2015, arXiv:1508.0459