Recently, Sahni, Shafielo o & Starobinsky (2014) combined two independent
measurements of H(z) from BAO data with the value of the Hubble constant H0=H(z=0), in order to test the cosmological constant hypothesis by means of an
improved version of the Om diagnostic. Their result indicated a considerable
tension between observations and predictions of the ΛCDM model.
However, such strong conclusion was based only on three measurements of H(z).
This motivated us to repeat similar work on a larger sample. By using a
comprehensive data set of 29 H(z), we find that discrepancy indeed exists.
Even though the value of Ωm,0h2 inferred from Omh2 diagnostic
depends on the way one chooses to make a summary statistics (weighted mean or
the median), the persisting discrepancy supports the claims of Sahni, Shafielo
o & Starobinsky (2014) that ΛCDM model may not be the best description
of our Universe.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for publication in the ApJ