research

On the commutation of generalized means on probability spaces

Abstract

Let ff and gg be real-valued continuous injections defined on a non-empty real interval II, and let (X,L,λ)(X, \mathscr{L}, \lambda) and (Y,M,μ)(Y, \mathscr{M}, \mu) be probability spaces in each of which there is at least one measurable set whose measure is strictly between 00 and 11. We say that (f,g)(f,g) is a (λ,μ)(\lambda, \mu)-switch if, for every LM\mathscr{L} \otimes \mathscr{M}-measurable function h:X×YRh: X \times Y \to \mathbf{R} for which h[X×Y]h[X\times Y] is contained in a compact subset of II, it holds f1 ⁣(Xf ⁣(g1 ⁣(Ygh  dμ))dλ) ⁣=g1 ⁣(Yg ⁣(f1 ⁣(Xfh  dλ))dμ) ⁣, f^{-1}\!\left(\int_X f\!\left(g^{-1}\!\left(\int_Y g \circ h\;d\mu\right)\right)d \lambda\right)\! = g^{-1}\!\left(\int_Y g\!\left(f^{-1}\!\left(\int_X f \circ h\;d\lambda\right)\right)d \mu\right)\!, where f1f^{-1} is the inverse of the corestriction of ff to f[I]f[I], and similarly for g1g^{-1}. We prove that this notion is well-defined, by establishing that the above functional equation is well-posed (the equation can be interpreted as a permutation of generalized means and raised as a problem in the theory of decision making under uncertainty), and show that (f,g)(f,g) is a (λ,μ)(\lambda, \mu)-switch if and only if f=ag+bf = ag + b for some a,bRa,b \in \mathbf R, a0a \ne 0.Comment: 9 pages, no figures. Fixed minor details. Final version to appear in Indagationes Mathematica

    Similar works