Funding This work was supported by a Chief Scientist Office Postdoctoral Training Fellowship in Health Services Research and Health of the Public Research (Ref PDF/12/06). The views expressed in this paper represent the views of the authors and not necessarily the views of the funding body.Peer reviewedPostprin

Bhattacharya, S.

McLernon, D.J.

Mol, B.W.J.

Steyerberg, E.W.

te Velde, E.R.

Human Reproduction

English

Infertility is defined as failure to conceive after 1 year of unprotected intercourse. This dichotomization into fertile versus infertile, based on lack of conception over 12-month period, is fundamentally flawed. Time to conception is strongly influenced by factors such as female age and whilst a minority of couples have absolute infertility (sterility), many are able to conceive without intervention but may take longer to do so, reflecting the degree of subfertility. This natural variability in time to conception means that subfertility reflects a prognosis rather than a diagnosis. Current clinical prediction models in fertility only provide individualized estimates of the probability of either treatment-independent pregnancy or treatment-dependent pregnancy, but do not take account of both. Together, prognostic factors which are able to predict natural pregnancy and predictive factors of response to treatment would be required to estimate the absolute increase in pregnancy chances with treatment. This stratified medicine approach would be appropriate for facilitating personalized decision-making concerning whether or not to treat subfertile patients. Published models are thus far of little value for decisions regarding when to initiate treatment in patients who undergo a period of, ultimately unsuccessful, expectant management. We submit that a dynamic prediction approach, which estimates the change in subfertility prognosis over the course of follow-up, would be ideally suited to inform when the commencement of treatment would be most beneficial in those undergoing expectant management. Further research needs to be undertaken to identify treatment predictive factors and to identify or create databases to allow these approaches to be explored. In the interim, the most feasible approach is to use a combination of previously published clinical prediction models

McLernon, D. J.

te Velde, E. R.

Steyerberg, E. W.

Mol, B. W. J.

Online Research @ Cardiff

Clinical prediction models to inform individualized decision-making in subfertile couples: a stratified medicine approach

Funding This work was supported by a Chief Scientist Office Postdoctoral Training Fellowship in Health Services Research and Health of the Public Research (Ref PDF/12/06). The views expressed in this paper represent the views of the authors and not necessarily the views of the funding body.Peer reviewe

Aberdeen University Research

Clinical prediction models to inform individualized decision-making in subfertile couples : a stratified medicine approach

McLernon, DJ

Velde, Egbert

Steyerberg, Ewout

Mol, BW

Bhattacharya, S

EUR Research Repository

D. J. McLernon

E. R. te Velde

E. W. Steyerberg

B. W. J. Mol

S. Bhattacharya

Crossref

Infertility is defined as failure to conceive after 1 year of unprotected intercourse. This dichotomization into fertile versus infertile, based on lack of conception over 12-month period, is fundamentally flawed. Time to conception is strongly influenced by factors such as female age and whilst a minority of couples have absolute infertility (sterility), many are able to conceive without intervention but may take longer to do so, reflecting the degree of subfertility. This natural variability in time to conception means that subfertility reflects a prognosis rather than a diagnosis. Current clinical prediction models in fertility only provide individualized estimates of the probability of either treatment-independent pregnancy or treatment-dependent pregnancy, but do not take account of both. Together, prognostic factors which are able to predict natural pregnancy and predictive factors of response to treatment would be required to estimate the absolute increase in pregnancy chances with treatment. This stratified medicine approach would be appropriate for facilitating personalized decision-making concerning whether or not to treat subfertile patients. Published models are thus far of little value for decisions regarding when to initiate treatment in patients who undergo a period of, ultimately unsuccessful, expectant management. We submit that a dynamic prediction approach, which estimates the change in subfertility prognosis over the course of follow-up, would be ideally suited to inform when the commencement of treatment would be most beneficial in those undergoing expectant management. Further research needs to be undertaken to identify treatment predictive factors and to identify or create databases to allow these approaches to be explored. In the interim, the most feasible approach is to use a combination of previously published clinical prediction models.D.J. McLernon, E.R. te Velde, E.W. Steyerberg, B.W.J. Mol and S. Bhattachary

Adelaide Research & Scholarship

http://orca.cf.ac.uk/114437/1/McLernon_et_al_HUMREP_14_SB.pdf

Clinical prediction models to inform individualized decision-making in subfertile couples : a stratified medicine approach

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Online Research @ Cardiff

Aberdeen University Research

EUR Research Repository

EUR Research Repository

Crossref

Adelaide Research & Scholarship