Cosaert, Carl P.

English

Andrews University

331BOOK REVIEWSInstitute for New Testament Textual Research. Novum Testamentum Graece: Nestle-Aland, 28th ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012, 94+890 pp. Hardcover, $59.95.After nineteen years, the highly anticipated new edition of  the Novum Testamentum Graece, or as it is more commonly referred, the Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament, has fi nally been published. This edition is the twenty-eighth in a long history of  volumes that date back to the seminal text of  Eberhard Nestle published in 1898. Whereas the last three editions were developed under the direction of  the now deceased Kurt Aland and an international team of  textual scholars, the current volume is the result of  the dedicated labor of  the Institute for New Testament Textual Research in Münster, Germany, under the supervision of  Holger Strutwolf.A fi rst glance at the volume might lead one to conclude that little change has taken place over the last nineteen years. The current edition not only has nearly the same look and feel as the NA27, but the Greek text of  the two volumes is identical, except for 34 largely minor textual changes across 31 verses in the Catholic Epistles. While such textual gains may seem modest, they do not refl ect the extent of  the advances that make the current volume a much-improved edition of  the NT text. These advances will be evaluated in connection to the stated goals identifi ed by the book itself: (1) to include the latest results from the Editio Critica Maior on the text of  the Catholic Epistles, and (2) to completely revise the textual apparatus for clarity of  use (48).Following the work of  the Editio Critica Maior, the text of  the Catholic Epistles has been established on an entirely different basis from the rest of  the NT text. The method used to do this is the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method developed by Gerd Mink. Instead of  classifying manuscripts and their readings based on “text-types,” this method seeks to be more comprehensive by comparing all the readings in a given manuscript to all the other readings across an entire book or corpus in order to determine the genealogical “coherence” among the various readings. One of  the interesting results of  this method so far is the greater appreciation it has produced for the role of  Byzantine manuscripts in the textual history of  the Catholic Epistles. While scholarly consensus is growing in favor of  the benefi cial aspects of  the Coherence-Based Genealogical Method, the verdict is still out on whether it will be as useful outside of  the Catholic Epistles.The vast majority of  the 34 textual changes in the volume involve one word, either an omission, addition, replacement, elision, or a change of  case. Of  the remaining differences, nine involve two words, three involve three words, and one involves four words. The most signifi cant changes occur in 2 Pet 3:10 and Jude 5. The textual problem in 2 Pet 3:10 involves the reading eu`reqh,setai and its meaning in relation to the destruction of  the world on the day of  the Lord. 332 SEMINARY STUDIES 51 (AUTUMN 2013)Although the reading is diffi cult, the NA27 listed it as the initial reading due to its strong external support (א B K P 0156vid 323 1241 1739txt) and because it also offers the best explanation for the rise of  the other variants. The text of  the present edition, however, prefers the reading ouvc  eu`reqh,setai. This is surprising since it does not have the support of  a single Greek witness, and the support it does have is extremely minimal (syph mss sa cvvid). The other interesting textual change is the decision to favor the reading in Jude 5 that instead of  identifying Jesus as the Lord, instead presents him as the one who delivered the Israelites out of  Egypt. This change is understandable. It has the strongest support among both Greek and versional witnesses, and it is also the most diffi cult reading, suggesting why later scribes would have altered it. Along with a newly established text of  the Catholic Epistles, there is also a completely revised textual apparatus for them. Following aspects from the Editio Critica Maior, the revised apparatus in the Catholic Epistles is somewhat different than the apparatus for the rest of  the NT. The primary differences include the abbreviation “Byz” to represent the “Byzantine text in a pure form,” instead of  the gothic 𝔐, and the sign “◆” to identify passages that the editors are divided about concerning which variant represents the initial reading. The editors also abandoned the use of  the square brackets ([]) in the Catholic Epistles since they felt more sophisticated forms were necessary to describe differing degrees of  reliability. These changes are likely a harbinger of  the sort of  revisions that will eventually defi ne the entire textual apparatus of  future editions of  the Greek text.The most signifi cant feature of  the present volume, however, is the revision and correction of  its entire critical apparatus. An indication of  the extent of  these changes can be seen in the increase of  the number of  pages between Matthew to Revelation (from 680 pages in the NA27 to 789 pages in the NA28). While some of  this increase may be attributed to a slight increase in the size and spacing of  the Greek font, the vast bulk of  the increase is due to the changes made to the apparatus, which include both the addition and elimination of  variant readings and the witnesses that support them.A comparison of  the manuscripts listed in Appendix 1 of  the NA27 and NA28 reveal that 219 manuscripts were deemed insignifi cant for establishing the text of  the NT and therefore eliminated. This included the removal of  93 of  the 272 uncial manuscripts, 121 of  the 219 miniscule manuscripts, and the removal of  5 of  the 10 Greek lectionaries cited previously. In an attempt to ascertain how the elimination of  these witnesses affected the various readings in the textual apparatus, a sample examination was made of  each variant affected by the elimination of  the 18 miniscule manuscripts listed on p. 710 of  the NA27 (1518 1555 1573 1574 1678 1689 1709 1729 1758 1827 1831 1832 1836 1838 1845 1846 1875 1877). The following types of  changes were revealed: (1) outside of  the Catholic Epistles, 11 minor variants were removed 333BOOK REVIEWS(e.g., Matt 5:45; Luke 3:22, 23-31; Rom 3:25; 2 Cor 2:9, 8:21; Phil 1:20; Heb 11:13; Rev 2:1), and the support for 3 readings was removed (Acts 5:9; Gal 1:3; Rev 1:6); and (2) within the Catholic Epistles, 10 variants were removed, and the support of  21 other readings was affected. While the loss of  the testimony of  these 18 miniscule manuscripts is unfortunate, their textual value simply did not outweigh their absence in a hand edition of  the NT. Other casualties in the NA28 apparatus include the loss of  subscriptions, the   symbol identifying readings from the NA26, conjectures, and the signs pc (pauci) and al (alii), due to the confusion over the signifi cance of  the presence or absence of  these two signs on a given reading.The absence of  the above manuscripts and features from the apparatus of  the NA28 was offset by a number of  additions. The most notable is the inclusion of  new manuscripts deemed more signifi cant for the study of  the text, including 11 papyri, 1 uncial ms (0211); and 10 miniscule mss (5 18 30 288 606 1175 1718 2473 2521 2685). An example of  how these new witnesses augment the current apparatus can be seen in the revised support of  the initial text of  Rom 5:2. In addition to increasing the textual support of  the passage by seven new witnesses, the revised apparatus also includes the support of  three current witnesses (104 630 1241) that were not listed previously. Until a searchable form of  the new apparatus is available, it is impossible to determine how signifi cant these particular manuscripts will be on the current text. Other noteworthy features that should not be overlooked include (1) the much welcomed decision to spell out the full text of  variant readings instead of  merely abbreviating them (e.g., James 1:17), (2) a bolder vertical line to separate variant readings in the apparatus, (3) the revision of  the minor readings in Appendix 2 (an increase from 15 to 28 pages) that includes moving some minor readings to the main apparatus itself  (e.g., Matt 2:23), and (4) the expansion of  the textual citations and allusions in Appendix 4 (now Appendix 3). The NA28 marks another signifi cant and much welcomed stage in the history of  NT textual criticism. The advances it has made in establishing the text of  the Catholic Epistles and the accuracy and clarity of  its revised textual apparatus will make it the defi nitive text for scholarly study for years to come. It is a “must have” purchase for professors, seminary students, and pastors alike.Walla Walla University            CARL P. COSAERTCollege Place, Washington Joosten, Jan. The Verbal System of  Biblical Hebrew: A New Synthesis Elaborated on the Basis of  Classical Prose. Jerusalem Biblical Studies, 10. Jerusalem: Simor Ltd., 2012. 513 pp. Hardcover, $75.00.Since the days of  pioneers such as Wilhelm Gesenius and Samuel Driver in the nineteenth century, the question of  how to understand the verbal system 

Novum Testamentum Graece: Nestle-Aland, 28th ed. [review] / Institute for New Testament Textual Research

https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3284&amp;context=auss

Novum Testamentum Graece: Nestle-Aland, 28th ed. [review] / Institute for New Testament Textual Research

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Andrews University