CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
A review of mentorship measurement tools
Authors
Yanhua Chen
Andrea Hilton
Roger Watson
Publication date
1 January 2016
Publisher
'Elsevier BV'
Doi
Cite
Abstract
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. Objectives: To review mentorship measurement tools in various fields to inform nursing educators on selection, application, and developing of mentoring instruments. Design: A literature review informed by PRISMA 2009 guidelines. Data Sources: Six databases: CINHAL, Medline, PsycINFO, Academic Search Premier, ERIC, Business premier resource. Review Methods: Search terms and strategies used: mentor* N3 (behav* or skill? or role? or activit? or function* or relation*) and (scale or tool or instrument or questionnaire or inventory). The time limiter was set from January 1985 to June 2015. Extracted data were content of instruments, samples, psychometrics, theoretical framework, and utility. An integrative review method was used. Results: Twenty-eight papers linked to 22 scales were located, seven from business and industry, 11 from education, 3 from health science, and 1 focused on research mentoring. Mentorship measurement was pioneered by business with a universally accepted theoretical framework, i.e. career function and psychosocial function, and the trend of scale development is developing: from focusing on the positive side of mentorship shifting to negative mentoring experiences and challenges. Nursing educators mainly used instruments from business to assess mentorship among nursing teachers. In education and nursing, measurement has taken to a more specialised focus: researchers in different contexts have developed scales to measure different specific aspects of mentorship. Most tools show psychometric evidence of content homogeneity and construct validity but lack more comprehensive and advanced tests. Conclusion: Mentorship is widely used and conceptualised differently in different fields and is less mature in nursing than in business. Measurement of mentorship is heading to a more specialised and comprehensive process. Business and education provided measurement tools to nursing educators to assess mentorship among staff, but a robust instrument to measure nursing students' mentorship is needed
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
Supporting member
Repository@Hull - Worktribe
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:hull-repository.worktribe....
Last time updated on 27/02/2018
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.nedt.2016...
Last time updated on 09/01/2021
University of Hull Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:hull-repository.worktribe....
Last time updated on 10/07/2023
Western Sydney ResearchDirect
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:researchdirect.westernsydn...
Last time updated on 30/11/2020