CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Healthy Living after Cancer: A dissemination and implementation study evaluating a telephone-delivered healthy lifestyle program for cancer survivors
Authors
P Baldwin
AG Boltong
+24 more
F Boyle
K Chapman
KS Courneya
W Demark-Wahnefried
EG Eakin
A Girgis
AD Goode
MR Haas
SC Hayes
JE Hiller
M Jefford
B Koczwara
K Lane
S McKiernan
L Millar
GD Mishra
L O'Brien
MM Reeves
EL Robson
CM Saunders
KH Schmitz
G Sharplin
JL Vardy
K White
Publication date
1 January 2015
Publisher
'Springer Science and Business Media LLC'
Doi
Cite
View
on
PubMed
Abstract
© 2015 Eakin et al. Background: Given evidence shows physical activity, a healthful diet and weight management can improve cancer outcomes and reduce chronic disease risk, the major cancer organisations and health authorities have endorsed related guidelines for cancer survivors. Despite these, and a growing evidence base on effective lifestyle interventions, there is limited uptake into survivorship care. Methods/Design: Healthy Living after Cancer (HLaC) is a national dissemination and implementation study that will evaluate the integration of an evidence-based lifestyle intervention for cancer survivors into an existing telephone cancer information and support service delivered by Australian state-based Cancer Councils. Eligible participants (adults having completed cancer treatment with curative intent) will receive 12 health coaching calls over 6 months from Cancer Council nurses/allied health professionals targeting national guidelines for physical activity, healthy eating and weight control. Using the RE-AIM evaluation framework, primary outcomes are service-level indicators of program reach, adoption, implementation/costs and maintenance, with secondary (effectiveness) outcomes of patient-reported anthropometric, behavioural and psychosocial variables collected at pre- and post-program completion. The total participant accrual target across four participating Cancer Councils is 900 over 3 years. Discussion: The national scope of the project and broad inclusion of cancer survivors, alongside evaluation of service-level indicators, associated costs and patient-reported outcomes, will provide the necessary practice-based evidence needed to inform future allocation of resources to support healthy living among cancer survivors. Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) - ACTRN12615000882527(registered on 24/08/2015
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
University of Queensland eSpace
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:espace.library.uq.edu.au:U...
Last time updated on 04/08/2016
Adelaide Research & Scholarship
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:digital.library.adelaide.e...
Last time updated on 18/06/2017
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12885-015-...
Last time updated on 01/04/2019
University of Melbourne Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:jupiter.its.unimelb.edu.au...
Last time updated on 29/04/2021
OPUS - University of Technology Sydney
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/...
Last time updated on 20/04/2021