The main source of Bacterial contamination of Estuary waters are domestic waste water and sewage discharge. In this present investigation, Green Mussels were collected from three different stations of Chennai Coast - Ennore, Royapuram and Muttukadu. The mussels were degutted and bacteria were isolated using selective and non-selective agar medium and further confirmed by biochemical tests. The organisms were ident illed to generic or group level according to Bergey's manual of systematic Bacteriology. Different group of fecal coli forms and Vibrio spp. have been isolated. Escherichia coli, Vibrio alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus and V. harveyi were the dominant species. Vibrio parahaemolyticus, a facultative pathogen widely complicated in outbreaks of gastroenteritis related to the consumption of improperly processed seafood was present in the gut of Green Mussels

Ganga Baheerathi, C

Gayathri, V

Revathi, K

Sethi, S N

CMFRI Digital Repository

Proceedings of International Conference on Implications of Biotechnology on Biodiversity and its Conservation, January 27 & 28, 2011 Identification of Gut Microflora from Green Mussel (Perna viridis) *v. Gayathri, C. Ganga Baheerathi, K. Revathi, Satyanarayan Sethi Abstract DThc main source of Bactcrial contamination of Estuary waters are domestic waste water and sewage discharge. In this prcscnt im"cstigation, Green Mussels werccollectcd from three different stations ofChennai Coast - Ennore, Royapuram and Muttukadu. The mussels were degutted and bacteria were isolated using selective and non·sclective agar medium and further conllrmed by biochemical tests. The organisms were ident illed to generic or group level according to Bergey's manual of systematic Bacteriology. Different group of fecal coli forms and Vibrio spp. have been isolated. Escherichia coli, Vibrio alginoiyticlIs, V. paraJwemolyticus and V harveyi were the dominant species. Vibrio parahaemolyticus, a facultative pathogen widely complicated in outbrcaks of gastroenteritis related to the consumption of improperly processed scafood was present in the gut of Grecn Mussels. Introduction Estuaries Ecosystems are deteriorating day by day through multifarious malHnade activities. The dumping of enonnous quantities of sewage and industrial emuents in to estuaries has resulted in a drast ic rcduction of shallow water IIsh populations, increased pollution and ecological imbalance resulting in the large scale disappearance of numerous 110ra and fauna (Rajendran et 0/., 2004).The microbiola of bivalve mollusks has been examined mainly from the public health hazard since they may concentrate pathogenic microorganisms and cause diseases in humans through their consumption. The recovery of human pathogenic bacteria from shellfish samples has been widely reported, and most of the studies have focused on fecal contamination, enteric pathogens and pathogenic species of Vibrio and coliform.\· . Ennore creek is located in Thiruvallur District of Tamilnadu with geographica l co·ordinatcs of North Latitude 13° 10' and East Longitude 80° 20'. The total area of the creek is 2.25 sq kill which lies 20 km away from Chennai in Northward dircction. The area experi ences rainfall mainly from Southeast and Northwest Monsoons. The temperature ranges from 25°C to 40Q C Fish and Shellfish products arc subjected to mandatory inspection, including microbiological ana lyses for bacterial pathogens like Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus by importing cOLIn tries. The MlIttlikkadu backwater La!. 1249' N; Long 80 15' E) extcnds for a distance of20 kill from the mouth. The backwater runs al ri ght angle to the coast for a distance of about 3 kill and branches in to Southern and Northern wings. The Green mussel Perna viridis is one of the commercially important marine bivalves found all along the East and the West Coasts (Rao, 1974) of India. These bivalve mollusks typically inhabit the estuaries and coastal areas that are increas ingly contaminated with anthropogenic chemicals (Oliver el ai. , 2000). Marine bivalves accumulate large number of microorganisms including Gram·negative Achromobacter spp, Aeromonas spp, Alcaligenes spp, Fiavobacteium spp, Pseudomonas spp and Vibrio spp organisms and Gram·positive Bacillus spp, COIYllebacterium spp and Micrococclls spp organ isms. (Olafsen el al., 1993) The members of the family Vibrionaceae contribute 60% of the total bacterial population (Simidu and Tsukamoto, 1985). Sinee Vibrio species are isolated from water, sediment, invertebrates and IIshes they are cons idered as autochthonous marine and estuarine micronora. (Griemens et al., 1986). Vibrio parahaemolyticllS, V cholerae and V vu/nijiclis arc the principal Vibrio species linked to seafood borne infections. The bacteria responsible for the early stage of spo ilage in bivalve she ll fish are thought to be derived mainly from their natural 110ra (Jay 1978). The genus Vibrio includes more than 35 species, mostly marine in origin. A number of Vibrio species other than Vibrio choierae, may cause disease in man mainly by ingestion of raw sea food. Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vlllimiclls and VVIl/llijiCIIS arc food poisoning bacteria which are normal habilants in estuarine and marine environments and are frequent ly isolated from seawater and seafood. Resel/rch Scholl/r .Sa/ilyabama University. ellennai. "Ethiraj Col/ege for Women. Egmore, Chemwi .... Cen/ral Marille Fisheries Research IlIslillile. Chemwi 'Cornpollding AlIllwr:gai3dilli@yahoo.co.in I 19 I Supplementto Advanced Biotech. Vol. 10 Issue 10 I April 20 I I Proceedings of International Conference on Implications of Biotechnology on Biodiversity and its Conservation, January 27 & 28, 2011 Among halophillic Vibrios V. algillolyticlfs, V. JIlivialis and V mersscllllikovii arc also pathogenic for humans, while V anguil/arulll represents a pathogen for fi shes and other marine animals. (Fanner and llickman Brenner, 1992). The presence of specific human pathogenic species of Vibrio can serve as an indicator of public hcalth safety of water and food destined for human consumption.(Colwell and Kaper, 1977). lIenee forth a detailed study was done to enumerate the heterotrophs and also to identify the predominant bacteria in the gut of Grecn mussels in the Enllore estuary, Royapuram and in Muttukadu. Materials and Methods Sampling was done during April, July and October 2010 .To avoid contamination from surface, water samples werc collected from 1 mctcr below the surface using samplers. Watcr samples were collected in pre -stcrilizcd bottles. With precautions 10-15 mussel samples were co llected, held in an icc box and transported to Microbiological Laboratory within 4 hours for further examination. Around 10-12 mussels were taken for observation. Cleaning, shucking and preparation of the mussel for bacteriological cxamination were done aseptically. The shell liquor of the mussel were discarded and the gut was removed. The gut was aseptically transferred to a sterile bottle. The gut was transfcrrcd to the sterilc test tube containing 10 ml ofsterilc sea water having"Twecn 80. The tube was kcpt on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm. The mixture was homogenized, serially diluted and plated in Zobell Marine Agar media.and Nutrient agar with different composition of NaC!. Predominantly 4-5 organisms were isolated and identified. Isolation and Idcntifiction Individua l colonies from Zobell Marine Agar media were randomly selected and subcultured. After purification, the organisms were tested for Gram reaction, motility and Biochemical tests (IMViC), 112S production, sucrose, lactose and mannitol fermentation. The organisms were identified to generic or group level according to Bergey's manual of systematic Bactcriology (Buchanan and Gibbons 1974) and (Baumann and Baumann 1981). Result and Discussion Microbiological analysis results of the Green mussel Perna riridis were summarized in Table I and 2. Vibrio cholerae. Vibrio paraJwemolyliclIs, Vibrio damsela. Vibrio haneyi, Klebsiella sp, Aeromonas sp. Cirrobacler sp. Streptococclls /aecalis, Escherichia coli and Protells mirabilis were isolated from mussel. The total count of bacteria isolated from the mussels in case of Ennore was more in the month of October, whereas other places lik e Royapuram and MUlhukadu was comparatively low -(186 xlO' CFUlg and 163 x 10' CFUIg) The lotal COUIlI of bacteria in the month of Octobcr 2010 is high, Sampling period Mussel-a (CFU Ig) APRIL 2010 137x10' 128x10' 89 x 10' JULY 2010 146 x 10' 97 x 10' 63 x 10' OCTOBER 2010 TNTC 134x10' 92 x 10' Table 1. Baclerial populalion in gul of Green Mussels (Pema viridis) of Ennore estuary, a -10 mussels per sample (100 ·200g of mussel tissue was exercised for analysis) Total viable counts per gram of mussel tissue. Monlh APRIL 2010 JULY 2010 OCTOBER 2010 Green mussel (Perna viridis) gul Klebsiella pneumoniae Aeromonas hydrophi/a Vibrio damsela Escherichia coli Cifrobacler !reundii Klebsiella pneumoniae Aeromonas hydrophi/a Vibrio haNeyi Escherichia coli Proteus mirabilis Klebsiella pneumoniae Aeromonas hydrophi/a Vibrio parahaemolylicus Escherichia coli Proteus mirabilis comparatively with thc other months of all thc three places sampled. This could be due to the heavy rain during monsoon. Mussel from Royapuram and Ennore was found 10 be more polluted when compared Muthukadu. wit h The heterotrophic bacterial species in these area are characterized by the mixture of marine, fresh water and so il which are adapted to organic rich environment (Kueh and chan 1975). Table 2. Predominant organisms isolaled from green mussel of Ennore estuary The different species of bacteria in the green mussel from the gut of different regions of Chet1nai Coast and different seasons did not show any variation, where almost all bacterial species isolated were similar. The distribution of bactcria further depends on changes in water temperature, salinity and other physico-chemical parameters (Alavandi, 1990) Sampling period Mussel-a (CFU Ig) 126 x 10' APRIL 2010 104x10' 83 x 10' 129 x 10' JULY 2010 120x10' 109x106 163 x 10' OCTOBER 2010 123x10' 119 x 10' Table 1: Bacterial populalion in gul of Green Mussels (Perna viridis) of Mulhukadu, TN. a ·10 mussels per sample (100 ·200g of mussellissue was exercised for analysis) Tolal viable counls per gram of mussel tissue. Since it is observed that the number of organisms are low in the month of July, it is advisable to consume this green mussel at the month of July. The present study shows presencc of pathogenic bacterial sp. throughout the pre-monsoon, monsoon and post-monsoon period. This study reports the presence of Vihrio sp. in Mussel sample. Vibrio cholerae was present in Mussel sample. Among Vibrio species, Vibrio cholerae is part of natural bacterial nora in aquatic environments. II causes Diarrhea, which results in loss of body fluids and minerals. Vibrio cholerae does not multiply in water but can survive for up to two weeks. It is salt tolerant, heat sensitive and destroyed by cooking. The possible reason could be the other bacteria predominating over Vibrio cholerae. The same results were also noticed in Wilson and Moore el 0/ 1996. In another research, 26 out of200 fresh seafood samples contained Vibrio spp., and the highest percentage of contamination was found in mussels (Baffone et a/2000). Vihrio parahaemolyticus has been found in wann coastal waters of countries throughout the world. These organisms cause severe abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea and vomiting. Vibrio parahaemolyticus diseases arc usually associated with the ingestion of raw or insufficien tly cooked scafood, improper post-harvest 120 1 Supplement to Advanced Biotech. Vol. 10 Issue 10 I April 20 I I Proceedings of Intemational Conference on Implications of Biotechnology on Biodiversity and its Conservation, January 27 & 28, 2011 Month Green mussel (Perna viridis) gut Pseudomonas aeruginosa APRIL 2010 Steptococcus faeca/is Escherichia coli Proteus mirabilis Klebsiella pneumoniae JULY 2010 Aeromonas hydrophila Vibrio harveyi Escherichia coli Vibrio alginolyticus Klebsiella pneumoniae OCTOBER 2010 Vibrio cholerae Vibrio harveyi Table 2.Predominant organisms isolated from green mussel of Royapuram Sampling period Mussel -a (CFU fg) 126x10' APRIL 2010 104x10' 83 x 10' 129x10' JULY 2010 120 x 10' I 109 x 10' 163 x 10' OCTOBER 2010 123 x 10' 119x10' Table 1: Bacterial population in gut of Green Mussels (Perna viridis) of Muthukadu, TN. a - 10 mussels per sample (100 -200g of mussel tissue was exercised for analysis) Total viable counts per gram of mussel tissue -storage conditions or poor handling of seafood during preparation (Cavallo et 01 2002). Vibrio parahaemolyticlIs was present in mussel samples similar to the results of Maugeri el of., 200 I The presence of Vibrio parahaemolyticlIs in marine environment is due to its adjusting well to the broad range of salinities. Recent studies have shown that V.cholerae naturally occurs in temperate estuaries and that cases of cholera in the Gulf coast region of the Unitcd states have resultcd from the inge s tion of contaminatcd shellfish, including inadequately cooked crab meat (Blake e t al, , 1980 ; Kasper el aI., 1979; Weissmann ela!. ,) The most common halophillic Vibrio species isolated from both clinical and environmental samples were Vibrio paraliaemolyliclIs (Yam et al.,). Environmenta l strains of Vibrio paraliaemo/yticus are typically not human pathogens. Howcver thcse strains cause disease in shrimps, oysters, mussels and other marine invertebrates. These results suggest consumption of Mussels withou t proper cooking leads to V. paraliaemolyriclls disease. Other Vibrio species isolated from the green mussel were V dawsela , V.harveyi and V. aigillo/yticlis. In general, abundance of all groups of bacteria were more during October i.e (monsoon period) which shows that inflow ofsurfaee waters together with sewage influences diversity of microbes. Escherich ia co li was detected through out the sampli ng period which shows that it is reasonable to assume that faecal pollution is morc influencing the number of coli forms in the water which indirectly affect the green mussels and other shell fishes which are filter feeders taking the bacterial pathogens along with the water. Common soi l bacteria like Aeromollas spp. also grow on green musse ls .similar observations were made on bivalves from the west coast of the United states and Japan (Sugita et al., 1981; Vasconcelos and Lee 1972). Month I APRIL 2010 JULY 2010 OCTOBER 2010 Green mussel (Perna viridis) gut Klebsiella pneumoniae Aeromonas hydrophila Escherichia coli Vibrio haNey; Vibrio cholerae Klebsiella pneumoniae Aeromonas hydrophila Vibrio harveyi Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Klebsiella pneumoniae Aeromonas hydrophila Vibrio parahaemolyticus Proteus mirabifis Vibrio cholerae Table: 2. Predominant organisms isolated from green mussel of Muthukadu. AerOmOfl(lS spp. is a facultatively anaerobic ,Gram negative organism that is commonly found in fresh water and sewage. It can be pathogenic to Frogs" fish and mammals , including man ( Kreig and Holt,1984). Vibrio paraha e m-olyriclls is compatib Ie with a marine or brackish aquatic environment adjusting well to the broad range of salin ities and this commonly found on shellfishes and all varieties offinfishes that are traditionally taken from marine and shore areas. (Syndam el 01., 1991 ).These stra ins cause disease in Shrimps, oysters ,mussels and othcr marine invertebrates (Puente et al ., 1992) and in Fishes(Chen and Hanna, 1992). Cilrobacler spp. is considered to be less sanitary significance and common in surface run o rr. Klebsiella spp. is ubiquitous and may be found in waters receiving carbohydrate rich emuents. Population density of Vibrio sp. in the marine environment is usually more because Vibrios can occur in a wide range of aquatic environments including estuaries, marine and coastal waters and sediments (Urakawa etal. , 2000; Suant ika et al.; 200 1; Vandenberghe et al. , 2003 ;Thompson el of., 2004;Venter el al., 2004; Chan el 01., 1986). Microbiologist rely on the principle that higher the incidence of sewage indicator bacteria in any environment ,higher wou ld be the chances for human pathogenic bacteria to be present (Brock et al.,Fujioka,2002). From the above observat ions emucnt outfall in to coasta l ecosystcm has to be managed. The pollution indicator bacteria and microbes of human health concern has to be reduced. References Baffone,W.,Pianetti ,A. ,Bruscolini,F. ,Barbie ri ,F. ,Cilterio,B.:Occurrence and expression ofvimlence related properties of Vibrio species isolated from widely consumed scafood products. Jilt.). Food Microbiol. ,2000:S4:9-18. Brock ,T .. ,Madigan ,M.T., maetillko ,J.M and Parker ,J.(1994).BioJogy of Microorganism (7'" Ed ition), Prent ice hall ,New Jersey Cavallo , R. A. , & StabiJi , L. (2002). Presence of vibrios in seawater and Mytilugalloprovincialis (Lam.) from the. Mar Piccolo of Taranto ( Ionian Sea). Wale!" Res.,2002:36:37 I 9-3726 Colwell , R.R. and J. Kaper , 1977. Vibrio spp. as bacterial indicators of potential health hazards associated with water. American Society For Testing and materials pp: 115 I 2 I I Supplement to Advanced Biotech. Vol. 10 Issue I 0 I April 20 I I Proceedings of International Conference on Implications of Biotechnology on Biodiversity and its Conservation, January 27 & 28, 2011 Dalsgaard ,A ., Mazur ,J. , Dalsgaard ,I. Misident ification of Vibrio eholerea 0 155 isolated from imported shrimp as 0 sea group 0 139 due to cross-agglutination with commercial 0139 antisera. J Food protect. 2002;65:670-672. Farmer.J.J III & Hichman Brenner ,F.N (1992) The genera Vibrio and Photobacterium.ln the Prokaryotes vol II 2nd edn.cds Balows,4,Truper,H.G,Dworkin,M,Hardcr,W and Schleifer ,K.H pp29523011.Newyork, NY: Springerveriang. Fujioka,R.(2002).Microbial indicators of marine recreational water quality.In :Manual of Environmental Microbiology, Second edition, American society for Microbiology press, Washington DC,234 - 243 Grimens, D.J., P. Brayton, R.R. Colwell and S.H. Gruber,. 1986. Vibrio.'> as autochthonous flora of neretic sharks. SyS!. Appl. Microiol., 6: 221-226. Jay .J.M 1978 Modern food Microbiology ,200 edn. Newyork. D van Noshand. Kcuh,C.S.W and Chan,K.Y.1975The distribution of heterotrophic bactcria related to some indicators of marine pollution in Tolo harbour, Hong Kong.In the proceeding of the special Symposium on marine Sciences, December 1973 pp 95 -99.1-long kong: The pacific science association. Potentially pathogenic Vibrios in brackish waters and Musse ls .T.L.Maugeri, D.Coceamo, C.Cugliandolo J Appl Microbial. 2000 Aug;R9(2):26 1-6. Pucntc ME, Vega villasantc F, Holguin G,Bashan Y (1992)Susceptibilty of the brine shrimp Artemia and its pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus to chlorine dioxide in contaminated scawtcr..J.Appl.Bacteriol 73(6);465-471. Simidu, U., and K. Tsukamoto. 1985. Habitat segregation and biochcmical activities of marine members of the family. Vibriollaceac. Appl. Environ. Microbial. 50:781-790. Sugita, 1-1., Tanaami, H., Kobashi, T., Deguchi, Y, 1981. Bacterial flora of coastal bivalves. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 47,655-661 Syndam DR and Gorbach SL 1991 Bacterial food poisoning in bacterial infections of Humans, Evans A S and Brahman P S, Editors, Plenum Press, New York, p 87-113. Vasconcelos GJ, Lee JS. Microbial Flora of Pacific Oystcrs (Crassostrca gigas) Subjected to Ultraviolet-Irradiated Seawater. App/ Microbiol. /972Jan;23(I):11-16. Urakawa , H.,T.Yoshida, M.Nishimura and K.Ohwada, 2000. Characterzation of depth related population variation in Microbial communities of coastal marine scdiment using 16srDNA based approaches and quiniae profiling Environ. Microbial.,5:542-554 Wilson, I.G., Moore ,J.E : Presence of Salmonella spp.and Campyiobacter spp. in shellfish. Epidemiol. iJ!/eCI., 1996; 116: 147-153 122 I Supplement to Advanced Biotech. Vol. 10 Issue 10 I April 20 I I 

Identification of Gut Microflora from Green Mussel (Perna viridis)

http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/8625/1/Sethi_Identification_of_gut.pdf

Identification of Gut Microflora from Green Mussel (Perna viridis)

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CMFRI Digital Repository