Three species o f Azotobacter were isolated from prawn-cum-paddy fields o f Kerala. These

strains were found to have the optimum pH for growth and nitrogen fixation near or slightly

above neutrality, i.e., in the pH range o f 7.0 to 8.

Ninawe, A S

Paulraj, R

CMFRI Digital Repository

J.Aqua.,S(\991):  23-29E F F E C T  O F  pH  O N  G R O W T H  A N D  N IT R O G E N  F IX A T IO N  O F  A Z O T O B A C T E R  S P P .A. S. Ninawe1 and  R.  PaulrajCentral Marine Fisheries Research Institute P. B. No. 1603, Cochin 682 031, India1Department o f  Biotechnology, Block 2CGO Complex, Lodi Road, New Delhi 110 003, IndiaThree species o f Azotobacter were isolated from prawn-cum-paddy fields o f Kerala. These strains were found to have the optimum pH for growth and nitrogen fixation near or slightly above neutrality, i. e., in the pH range o f 7.0 to 8.5IN TR O D U C TIO NBiological nitrogen fixation by free-living bacteria in rice soils has been reported from alluvial, laterite, acid saline and acid sulphate saline soils (Sethunathan et al., 1983). The presence of Azotobacter spp. and their rate of multiplication and nitrogen fixation are governed by many factors including soil pH (Jensen, 1961; Roy et al., 1962). Nitrogen fixation by Azotobacter spp. as reported remained almost unchanged within the pH range of 6.24 to 8.34 at 10 to 30°C, decreased at more acidic or alkaline pH and complete inhibition was detected above 8.75 and below 5.00. The Azotobacter spp. count and nitrogen fixation were reported maximum near or slightly above neutral pH. The soil pH between 7.8 and 8.5 supported maximum population of * Azotobacter spp. and the count decreased with the increase in pH. However, the efficiency of nitrogen fixation is not affected by the increase of soil pH from 7.0 to 8.7 (Raju et al., 1974; Khullar and Chahal, 1975). Similar conclusions were made by other workers that the optimum pH required for growth and nitrogen fixation was near or slightly above neutrality (Yamagata and Itano, 1923; Rangaswami and Sadasivan, 1965).M ATERIAL AND METHODSThe present investigation was carried out at Narakkal (long. 76° 14' E; lat. 10° 03' N), a fishing hamlet in the Vypeen Island, 15 km north-west of Cochin on the south-west coast of India. Four ponds were selected for regular sampling of which two were perennial prawn culture systems and the other two were seasonal prawn culture systems where prawn and paddy are cultivated during the inter-monsoon (October-May) and monsoon (June - September) periods, respectively.24Water and sediment samples were collected fortnightly for a period of two years. Surface water samples were aseptically collected from the four fixed sites of each pond in sterilised 100-ml capacity polyethylene containers. After thorough mixing, the samples were preserved in 300-ml capacity BOD bottles for bacterial analysis. Sediment samples were collected from the four fixed sites with an impact cover (100 cm x 4 cm diam) made of perspex material from ihe upper 10-cm layer. About 5 cm depth of surface sediment layer was removed aseptically from each core sample and thoroughly mixed with a sterile spatula in a sterile bottle, followed by .:gorous shaking. Sediment samples from each pond were separately preserved in wide-mouthed sterile glass bottles. All the samples were transported to the laboratory in an ice-box. Media for free-living aerobic nitrogen-fixing bacteria and for Azotobacter spp. were prepared using double distilled water with 3% NaCl as suggested by Rodina (1972). Azotobacter spp. biomass/population was measured in 102 to 103 dilution in water samples and in 103 to 104 in sediment samples throughout the investigation period after standardising the population range. The incubauon was made for seven days at room temperature (28 ± 2°C), with controls in triplicate. After the incubation period, the presence or absence of bacteria in each tube was estimated from the turbidity of the culture media and the most probable number (MPN) per millilitre of water or per gramme of sediment was calculated from the number of positive tubes in each dilution. The bacteial biomass has been represented in figures as per millilitre of water or per gramme of sediments using monthly mean values.All the isolates, collected either from the water or from the sediments of the perennial and seasonal ponds, were purified by repeated streaking on nitrogen-free Jensen's agar medium and maintained at room temperature in the same medium throughout the period of investigation. The identification o f A zo tobacter  spp. isolates was based on Buchanan and Gibbons (1974). Morphological characters, viz., cell size, colony character, Gram stain, motility and capsule formation, and the biochemical characters, viz., fermentation properties, catalase activity, nitrate reduction, gelatin liquefaction, H2S production and NH3 formation, were studied according to Conn et al. (1957).The efficiency of strains to fix atmospheric nitrogen was studied by growing all of them in Jensen's medium o f neutral reaction as well as at the pH o f the soil from which they were isolated. The pH was adjusted using a buffer of the 0.2 M  solution of 2-Amino 2-Methyl 1-3 Propanediol (50 ml) with x ml (Table 1) of 0.2 M  HC1 diluted to 200 ml.Experiments were conducted to study the effect of pH on the growth and m u c zc ' jtion efficiency of nine (Azvl to Azv3, Azcl to Azc3, Azbl to Azb3) strains of A :::: r s r. The pH levels tested were 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0, 9.5, and 10.0. Strains -e re  grown in 100 ml o f Jensen's medium (Rodina, 1972) in sterilised Erlenmeyer flasks. The inoculated25Table 1. Quantities (ml) of  0.2 M HCI required to produce bufferRequiredpH0.2 M  HCI(x)RequiredpH0.2 M  HCI (x)10.0 2.0 7.0 51.09.5 8.5 6.5 58.09.0 16.7 6.0 62.08.5 34.0 5.5 70.08.0 41.0 5.0 78.07.5 45.0flasks were incubated at 28 ± 2°C for 15 days in dark. The growth of cells was determined by measuring the absorbance at 420 nm wth an Erma colorimeter and the amount of nitrogen fixed in liquid cultures was determined using the modified microkjeldahl method (Rodina, 1972). The experiment was repeated twice.R E SU L T SNitrogen-fixing bacterial population was observed in the range of 0.11 to 8.1x103 cells per millilitre of water and 1.1 to 92.0xl03 cells per gramme of sediment throughout the period of investigation (Table 2). All the 30 isolates were collected from the water and sediments o f the perennial and seasonal ponds. Of the 30 isolates, 13 were identified as Azotobacter chroococcum, nine as A. vinelandii and eight as A. beijerinckii. All the eight isolates of A. beijerinckii were Gram-negative circular cells, occurring individually. Their size ranged from 5.4 to 7.4 Jim in diameter, and were larger than both A. chroococcum  and A. vinelandii. They were non-motile, non-flagellated, cyst-forming and capsule-producing types, and were capable of produccing water- insoluble yellowish pigments. They were unable to utilise starch, mannitol and rhamnose as carbon source.In Azotobacter vinelanddii, a gradual increasing trend was observed with the increasing level of pH in strains A zvl to Azv3 (up to pH 7.0) which was followed by a sharp increase resulting in maximum growth at pH 7.5 in all the strains of A. vinelandii. After the maximum growth, with further increased in pH, a sharp decline was noticed in all the strains o f A . vinelandii. Nitrogen fixation also increased with the increasing level o f pH and the maximum level of pH was recorded at 7.5 in all the strains of A. vinelandii. Thereafter, a declining trend was evident (Fig. 1 & 2).26Table 2. Population of nitrogen fixing bacteria isolated from NarakkalMonths Salinity Nitrogen-fixing Azotobacter spp.(%c) _____________ bacteria__________________________________________Water Sediment Water Sediment(cells x 103/ml) (cells x lOtyg) (cells x 103/ml) (cells x 103/ml)October 3.5 0.4 3.6 0.3 3.3November 6.3 0.3 2.1 0.3 2.0December 11.4 0.2 1.? 0.1 1.1January 18.5 6.4 20.0 0.1 17.0February 20.7 2.0 27.0 2.0 20.0March 22.6 7.9 78.0 3.3 53.0April 28.3 3.3 82.0 2.1 79.0May 34.9 2.7 92.0 1.6 81.0June 8.5 8.1 81.0 7.9 64.0July 5.5 0.6 6.4 0.5 5.3August 4.5 0.9 6.1 0.5 4.6September 1.5 0.1 4.9 0.1 4.0October 3.8 0.1 4.0 0.1 3.3November 6.1 0.8 3.6 0.8 2.1December 12.5 0.4 3.3 0.3 1.7January 16.5 7.9 21.0 5.4 33.0February 21.5 7.8 20.0 4.9 46.0March 19.6 4.9 61.0 3.5 53.0April 27.1 2.7 81.0* 2.2 79.0May 35.6 4.6 61.0 4.0 53.0June 7.9 7.8 49.0 6.4 40.0July 5.9 0.8 6.4 0.8 5.3August 4.5 0.2 5 3 0.1 2.7September 1.5 0.1 2.1 0.1 2.027F ig . 1 .G row th  ofA z o to b a c te r  spp. a t d iffe ren t pH le v e ls-•-Azvl -+-Azv2 -*-Azv3 -e -A z d  -*-Azc2 -*-Azc3 -*-Azb1 -e-Azb2 Azb3Fig. 2. N itrogen  fix a tio n  in A z o to b a c te r  spp. a t d iffe ren t pH le v e ls-*-Azv1 -t-Azv2 ^-Azv3 -s-Azcl -*-Azc2 -*-Azc3 -* -A zd  -©-Azb2 -»-Azb328Among the three strains o f A. chroococcum, strains Azcl and Azc3 showed relatively poor growth at all the tested pH levels. In these strains, though maximum growth occurred at pH 8.0, there was not much variation in growth up to pH 8.5. Strain Azc2 also grew to the maximum level in pH 8.0. Conversely, all the stains of A. chroococcum fixed maximum nitrogen at pH 7.5 and there was not much difference recorded in nitrogen fixation in all the strains of A. chroococcum.In the case o f A. beijerinkii, there was a sharp increase in growth and it was markedly higher in all the strains (Azbl to Azb3). The maximum growth was recorded at pH 7.0 in all the strains. The maximum nitrogen fixation was also recorded at the same pH. However, strain Azb3 reported higher nitrogen fixation compared to strains Azbl and Azb2, and it was the highest among all the nine Azotobacter strains tested. There was a sharp decline in growth and nitrogen fixation in all the three strains of A. beijerinckii above pH 7.0.D IS C U S S IO N  \In the present study, most of the strains of A. vinelandii preferred a pH range of 7.0 to 7.5 for normal growth and nitrogen fixation, and the decline in growth and nitrogen fixaton was noticed in all the strains with further increase or decrease of pH. In A. chroococcum, relatively poor growth was noticed at all the tested pH levels and the maximum growth occurred between pH 8.0 and 8.5. Conversely, the maximum nitrogen fixation was noticed at pH 7.5 and there was not much difference noticed in maximum nitrogen fixation in all the strains of A. chroococcum.In A. beijerinckii, the growth and nitrogen fixation were found to be higher compared to A. vinelandii and A. chroococcum. But, pH levels below 7.0 were detrimental to the growth as well as nitrogen fixation in A. beijerinckii. Some authors isolated A. beijerinckii in-situ  with its growth and nitrogen fixation at pH 5.6 (Tchan, 1953; Jensen, 1955). Koleshko (1961), and Boyd and Boyd (1962) established that the acidification of the medium leads to a sharp decline in viability and nitrogen fixation ability. According to them, at PH 4.5, the growth of the strains is completely inhibited. However, in the present findings, growth and nitrogen fixation were completely suppressed at pH below 7.0 in all the strains of A. beijerinckii. The optimum pH for these strains was found to lie near or slightly above neutrality as supported by the work of many other authors (Yamagata and Itano, 1923).Khullar and Chahal (1975) reported maximum count of Azotobacter spp. in the soil pH 7.8 and 8.0, and the counts decreased with the increase in pH. The sediment pH above 9.0 resulted in a decrease in nitrogen fixation in all the strains of A. chroococcum  and A. vinelandii. This reveals a wide variation in capacity to fix atmospheric nitrogen by different isolates of A. chroococcum and A. vinelandii.29The present study indicates that the growth and nitrogen fixation thrive best at the pH level above 7.0 and below 8.5 in A. v ineland ii, A . b e ijerin ck ii  and A . ch ro o co ccu m ,  and the pH above and below this reduces the growth and nitrogen fixation activity in all the nine strains tested. A. b e ije r in ck ii  strains are reported to be the most efficient strains compared to A . v ine land ii  and A. chroococcum  both in their counts and nitrogen fixation activity. From the present observation and the observations made by other workers, it is clear that the optimum pH for the growth and nitrogen fixation of A zo to b a c te r  spp. is near or slightly above neutral pH.A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T SThe authors wish to express their gratitude to Dr E. G. Silas, former Director, and to Dr P. S. B. R. James, Director, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, for providing facilities, and for their guidance and encouragement.R E F E R E N C E SBoyd, W. L. and J. W. Boyd, 1962. Prcscnce o f Azotobacter species in polar regions. J. Bacteriol., 83: 429-430.Buchanan, R. E. and N. E. Gibbons (Eds), 1974. Bergey's Manual for Determinative Bacteriology (8th ed.). Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1268 pp.Conn, H. J., M. W. Jennison and O. B. Weeks, 1947. Manual o f Microbiological Methods by the Society of American Bacteriologists. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, pp. 140-168.Jensen, H. L., 1955. Azotobacter macrocytogns n. sp. a N2-fixing bacterium resistant to acid reaction. ActaAgriculi Scand., 5: 280-294.Jensen, V., 1961. Rhamnose for detection and isolation of A. vinelandii Lipman. Nature, 190 : 832-833. Jurgensen, M. F. and C. B. Davey, 1968. Can. J. Microbiol., 14 : 1179-1183.K hullar, S. and V. P. S. Chahal, 1975. Distribution of Azotobacter  in the Punjab soils. J. Res., 13 : 398- 404.Koleshko, O. I., 1961. Effect of external factors on the morphology o f A zotobacter. Problems of plant physiology and microbiology (2nd ed.). Minsk, pp. 146-154.Raju, M. E., C. R. Venkataraman and G. Arunachalam, 1974. Relationship between Azotobacter population and certain physiological population of Tamil Nadu soils (Abstract). In: Tenth Annual Conference, Association o f Microbiologists, India, 1974. Abstract 28.Rangaswami. G. and K. V. Sadasivan, 1965. Studies on the occurrence o f Azotobacter in some soil types. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 12: 43-49.Rodina. A. G. I -~2. Methods in Aquatic Microbiology. University Pari: Press, Baltimore, 461 pp.Roy, A. B A. K Mondal, and M. K. Mukharjee, 1962. Distribution o f Azotobacter in the growing soils of Inc. a. Indian J . Microbiol., 2: 35-40.Sethunaihan, N . V. R. Rao, T. K. Adhya and K. Raghu, 1983. CRC Crii. Rev. Microbiol., 10: 125-172.Sulaiman, M.. 1973 Non-symbiotic nitrogen fixation in rice plants. Biol. Abstrc., 54, Entry 17553.Tchan, Y. T., 1953. Studies on N-fixing bacteria. Ill A. beijerinckii (Lipman, 1903, uar. acido-tolerans (Tchan, 1952). Proc. Linnean Soc. New South Wales, 78: 83-84.Yamagata, V. and A. Itano, 1923. Physiological study of A. beijerinckii and A. vinelandii types. J. B ad., 8: 100-107.

Effect of pH on growth and nitrogen fixation of Azotobacter Spp.

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CMFRI Digital Repository