Eels form an important fishery in different parts of the world and

they have attracted the attention of naturalists since the beginning of

this century, when the Danish scientist Johannes Schmidt (1906) made

the sensational discovery of the breeding migration of the European eel

Bal, D V

Mohamed, K H

CMFRI Digital Repository

[From the JOURNAL OF THE BO:'IBAY NATURAL HIST. Soc., August 1957.] A SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT OF lirE EELS OF BOMBAY • BY D. V. BAJ, AND K. H. ' J\10HAMED Department of Zoology, Institute of Science, Bombay (With fourteen text figures) INTRODU CT ION Eels f orm an im portant fishery in different parts of the world and they have attracted the attention of naturalists since the beginning of this century, when the Danish sc ientist Johannes Schmidt (1906) made the sensational d iscovery of the breeding migration of the European eel. They are a. fairly larg~ group of fishes, represeDte~ by a number of genera and species. Day (18891 record ed 42 species of eels belonging to 13 genera and 2 famili es ftom Indian waters, a.nd subsequent workers have added a few more t o this list. On the Bombay coast Hefford (1922) recorded two species of eels in the catch~s of the steam t r awler 'Will iam Carrick', and Sorely (1922) eight species during hi s general survey of the fisheries of the Bombay 'State. Fowler (l932) placed on reco rd two species of eels from Bombay. However, a full account of the taxonomy of the anguilliform fauna of Bombay waters i s not available, and hence an a.ttempt has been made here to describe the various species of marine eels occuring alo ng the Bombay coa.st. For this purpo se , collections of ee ls were made regularly from Sassoon Dock and Versova, two fish -la nd-ing centres which contribute greatly to the fish supply of Bombay city. . " The.. ob servations made during the course of this investigation show the occurrence of fourteen species belonging to seven genera and five families. Four of these, namely Muraenichthys gymnopterus (Blk.), and Pisoodonophis cancrivorus (Rich. ), Ophichthys ctphalozona (Blk.), and o. apicaiis (Benn.) are being reported for the first t ime from the Bombay coast. Of the eight spec ies recorded by Sorely (op . cit.), only five are found in this collection. KEY TO THE SPECIES RECORDED 1 1. Caudal present 2 Caudal absent 12 2. Pos terior nostril below eye in the form of a va lve in the upper lip Posterior nostrils superior or above the level of eye 3. Pectorals present Pecto rals absent 4. Teeth multisel ial, pharyngeal openings wide - slits 5. No c.an ines in the jaws Canine tecth in the jaws Muraenichthys gymnopterus 3 4 7 5 Uroconger lepturui 6 . 1 The generic and spec~fic names given here ar(: acco rd ing to Weber and de Beaufort (1916). [1] 733 JOUR:-IAL, ROMBAY NATURAL RIST. SOCIETY, Vol. 54 6. OUler row of teeth in mandibles ' directed outwards 'v Ou lec row of teeth in mandihles not directc=d outwards 7. H('ad and trunk Ii times or more than tail ... Head and trunk more or If!lllS equal to tail ·MurtUn~sox talabonoides A'/uratntsox cinereus Th).rsoidta macruru! 8 8. Mesial teeth on intermaxillary plate, Dot I anger than the periphe.al series Muratna (Gymnothfuax) piela M~sial teeth on intermaxillary plate, long and fang-like 9. Maxillary tee th in two or three series Maxillary teeth in single series 10. 9 Muraena (Gymnotharax) mellogris 10 Head and body with large jet-black spots separated from one another with narrow yellowish reticulations H ead and tail with dull yellowish reticula· t io ns o n brown background Muraena (Gymnothorax) jaDaginea va r • fa IJaginea 11. Well definl"d reti culations all over body, ta il considerably shorter than head and body ... Lines on body and tail not well defined. Tail longer than the head and trunk 11 Muraena (Gymnothorax) pseudothyrsoidea Afuraena (Gymnothorax) undulala var. undulala. 12. Tee th gpanular and in bands 13 T ee th conical and acute 14 13. Origin of dorsa l behind end of pectorals Pisondonophis boro Origin of dorsa l abnve middle of pectorals ... Pisoodonophis cancriuours 14. H ead and trunk more or less equal to tail... Ophichthys cephalozona Head and trunk I i or more in tail 0Phichthys apicalis NOTES ON THE SPECIES Muraenichthys gymnopterus (Bleeker). • This eel is rarely found in this localitya.nd only one specimen , 433 mID. long was obta.ined from among the" shrimp catches landed at VersoYa by bag· nets from a depth of about 11 fathoms. Its colour ' .... as yellowish brown in fresh condition. The species is characteri~ed by the anus being situated in the front half of the total length, and by the valve-like post-erior nostrils in the upper lip beneath the eyes. Fig. I. MUTaenichthy s gymnoplerus (Bleeker) Da.y (1889) re~orded two species belonging to this genus, viz. M. Jchuli-li and M. vermicular;s from India.n waters, while M. gymnoptenls is reported here for the fi rst time from Indi a. The maximum size of this species recorded so fa r is only 266 mm. It has R. fairly wide distribution and hg.s been rep orted from South Africa., Ceylon, Jays" Celebes, Philippines and Chiua ( Weuer & Beaufort, 1916). Uroconger lepturus (Richardson). This eel, known as 'tolaka' in Marathi, is commonly found in bag - net catches both at Sassoon Dock aud Versova. Being a sma ll fish growing to a maximum length of about 400 mm., it is never [2] • • A SYSTE~HTIC ACCOUNT 0[' THE EELS O F BOM BAY 734 obtained f r om the long - line catches. .,A lt.hough t he species i s ed ible it ha s DO commerc ial v a.l ue and i s gell e r#,ally u se d a s ba it for loog - l in e fi sh ing. It i s eas ily recognise d by its dark br own ish .c? !our a nd wh ip-like tapering tail. T he la t e ra l lin p. has a row of w h it ish sp ots. The la rges t s ize recorded duri ng th e course of tt is inves t igati on is 284 m m. F ig . 2. Uroconger ltplurus (Richa rdson) F owler (1 927 ) appears to be the f irst to record th is species fr om B om ba.y, t h ough D ay ( 1889) h a s r eco rded i t f ro m I n d ian wa ter S. Na ir (1 94,6) co lle..!ted it s a dults a nd larvae from th e i\:Iadras coast . It ha s a wides pread d ist r ibut ion and is r eporte d f r om Oman, t he seas of I ndia, Ceylon. Ja.va , Celebe s, Sumatra., Phi li ppines, a nd the China Se a . hl u raenesox talabonoides (Bleeker) . This speci es, which is t. he comm oneHt of a ll t.he ee ls of B ombay , con st itutes a ver.Y impo rt a nt fi shery and it commands a go od ma rkee, be ing an important food f is h. It is generally lan ded by the ho ok- a nd -l ine fi s hermen and a lso by the t rawler s. Thi s f is h is go lden ye llow in colour a nd 'is charact eri sed by havi ug exte rna lly d irec ted teeth in the mand ibles . Fig. 3. Muraencso.'( talabonojdes (Bieeke r) Ai . laiabot:oidts is a tr opica l f ish , Dot so widely di stributed as the ot her two species of t h e ge nus. Day (1889) com mented on i ts ra ri t y in t he Indi an \\· aters . The pre sent invest igat ion , however, sh ows t h a t i t is ve ry CO Ul mon i ll B om bay waters , a s outed by S orIcy (1 932; an d. H e fiord ( 1922) . The m axim um s ize recorded is 2, 080 W ill . Murae ne 50X .cine reus (F orska l,l. Th is fi sh, ranging up t o about 1.428 mm. in length, is fo uIld in small numbers in tb e co mmercia l :!atches Ia. nded a t Sas so ou D ock au d Ve rs ova . I t i s gener a. lly ca. ught with the h ouk - and - li ne s a nd occa s ic,nally in the bag - ne t s a s we ll as in trawl- nets . It hus a d ull white co lour beco m ing f ai rly d a.rk d or sa lly. T he m onth is IOllg wi th a dra wn - out snout . Th e sp~c ies is cha rao te ri sed by t he prese nce of st rong can ine teeth with ba sa l lo bes on the vomcr ines. I t i s con sidered t o be a good foo d fi sh a nd i s r3] 735 JOURNAL, BOMB.'Y NAT UR AL HI ST. SOCIETY, Vol. 54 locally known a s 'warn', a namp: which it shares with lvl. talahonoides. The larval forms and the elve rs of tI. cineTeus are also obta in ed in f a ir numbers from Sassoon Dock and Verso va in Apri~ and May. They are found mixed up wi th shrimp catches landed by the bag-nets approximately from 10 to 11 fathoms. u Fig. 4. MuratntSox cinereus (Forskal) !Jay (1889) observed that this is the most common of the MUToenesox species i n India n waters . .R efIord (1922), Fowler (1921), a nd Sorley (1 932) have noted its occurrence in Bombay water s in smaH numbers. Nail (1947) obtained the larvae arid the adults of this fish from Madras waters. Pillay (194:8) observed the species in commercial quantities in Kathiawar coast. Observations made on the numerous hauls taken by the t rawlers along the Kathiawar coast showed occasional occurrence of this species , although the major portion of the eel catch comprised of M. talabonoidts, The species has a very wide distribut ion and is recorded from most of the places of the Ind o-Australian Archipelago, east coast of Africa, Red Sea , coasts of India, Ceylon, ~hilippines, China and Japan . .... Thyrsoidea macruru. (Bleekei-). This species is occasionally found among the long-line catches of Sassoon Dock and Versova. I t has a very elongated body , deep brown in colour, and the largest specimen taken during this s tudy was 1,686 mm. long. Thi s specie8 is consumed exclusively by the poorer people "and does not constitute a fishery along this coast. Fig. 5. Thyrsoidta macruru! (Blecker) Day (1889) reported th is species as Murama macrura from I ndian water s but it was not recorded before from Bombay waters. It is known to occur in South Africa, Ceylon, a 1 ras coast, th e Andamans, New Guinea., and Formo sa. Nair (1947) recorde d its huval forms from the Madras planktoil. [4] A SYST S:vI\TlC Ar:COUNT OF THE EELS OF BOMRAY i 36 Muraena (Gymoothorax) picta AnI. ... This is a fairl y com m 'J ll eel in the in;;hor e waters of Bom bay an d i s gene rally obtained both in the long-line and bag-net c.atches . It is n ot enten and the fishermen con s ider its bi te to be p OIson ous . Its cha.racteristic col c uT is mottled brown on ye.lIowish background. The re i s consider able amount of irregularity in the a rrangeme nt of the spots and conseque ntly diffe rent patterns of colour can ,ofte n be n otice d 'within the species. The maximum !:i ize re corded here 1 5 623 mm. Fig. 6. M uraena (GyrTIfIQ(hoTQX) picta Ah l. Day (18&9) noted the occurrence of th is s pecies (A1lirama picta) in I nd ia n ",aters and Sorley (1932) fr om the Bombay State. It ba s a ve ry wide distribution, being rep o r ~ed fr om South A'f ric a. East Afri eR, Ma dagascar , south Arabia, seas of I nd ia, Ceylon, Malaya, Philippines, Aust ralia nnd West Pacific Islands. Muraena (Gymnothorax) me leagris Shaw. This species known as 'kill is ' in Marathi is frequontly obtained in the long - line Rrod bag -!let catches. Small- sized spec imens occur quite often am ong the shrimp catches-both at Sa.ssoon Dock and Versova . It is! brown in colour, with dee per brown spots all over the body. T-hi s fish has no r:ommercia l import ance except that it is cousumed by the poor class of pe ople . Norm a lly it is used as ba it in the long-li ne fishin g. The fi sherme-:t cons ider the bite of thi s spec ies also poisonous. The sizes recorded during thes!; observations ra nge from 312 mm, to 897 mIll. in length. Fig. 7. Muraula (Gymllothorax) mtltagris Shaw Though it h as bee n reco rded as M uraena mtltagris by Day (1889) from the seas of Iudia, till now th ere see ms to be no defini te reco rd of its occurrence in Bombay waters . The distribution of mtlw gris is very wide as it occurs in south Africa, Ea. st Afri ca , Seychelles, Mauritius, I udia, Mal ay Archipel ago. and the Pacific. Muraena (Gym no thorax) favaginea Bloch and Schneider. This is the t essel ated ee l very frequently observed in Bombay and its neighbourh ood I t has a jet black colour with well-defined reticulations of yellowish white li nes ma.king a completely tesselated .appearance . Specimens of this fi sh are quite often obt ained in the sh ore-se ines. operating in shallow wate rs with r ocky bottom. It is consi dered to be non-edible and poisonous. This speci es is al so an attractive aquarium fish a nd a Dumber of them are displayed in the Taraporevala Aquarium [5] 737 JOURNAL, BOMBAY NATURAL HIST. SOCIETY, Vol. 54 at Bombay. There is no fishery for this species in the locality. The maximum size observed is 863 'tam. Fig. 8. Muratna (Gymnoth~rax) jalJagintQ Bloch and Schneider nay (1889) has recorded it from Indian waters in the name of Murama lesst/ala a.nd Sorley (1932) from BQmbay waters. Besides, it has been reported from the east ('oast of Africa, Mauritius, South Arabia, Malay Archipelago, Sumatra, Singapore. New Guinea and China. Muraena (Gymnothorax) pseudothyrsoidea (Bleeker). This is a very common eel in Sa.ssoon Dock and Velso'va, generally obtained in loog-line as we1l as i"n bag-net catches. The species has light brownish spots on the head and body with dull yellowish lines or reticu-lations in between. It is also known as 'hessaI' in Marathi. It is not edible and as such has no cC'onomic significance. Howeve r, this fish is often used as bait in th o long line fishing. The largest size noted dildng the present investigation is 605 mm_ Fig. 9. M IITama (GymnothoTax) (luudothyrsoidea (Bleeker) Thi s species has heen recorded hy nay (1889) from Indian waters and Sorely in Bombay wa:ers. Ita distr ibution extends from the Sind coast and India to the Seychelles, Malay Archipelago, Philippines, and China. Muraena (Gymnothorax) undulata undulata (Lacepede). This species is very common in the ro cky inshore a reas of and lUany spp.cimens are kept in the Tal'aporevnla Aquarium. Fig. 10. Murama (Cymnothorax) undulata undulala (Laeepe:de) Bombay The fish has a mottled appearance with reddish brown blotches on du]) white background. One specimen collected from deeper waters by' a long. line fisherman at Sassoon Dock measured 682 mm. In Marathi it is [6] A SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNT OF THE EELS OF nOMBAY 738 know n as 'hessa l'. Apart from the fa ct that it is a good and ha rdy aquarium fi sh, it has no commercial value . "" , It has a very wide di stribut ion, being reported from South Afri ca, east co a ... t of Africa, Madagas ca r , Mauritius, R ed-Bea, seas of India, Ceylon, An daman Islands, Malay Archipelago, Philippine s. Pacific I s lands and Ch in a. Pisoodonophis boro (Hamilton-Buchanan). Two specimens, one fr om a rock-poo l Dear Cuffe P ar a dl3 and another fr om Dad a r beach, were obta ined during this study. The species is a burrowi ng form which is not norm a lly met with in the commercial fis h catches of th is locality It is easi ly di st inguished by the absence of caudal fi n and by the pre sence of bauds of granular teeth on the jaws. Th e origin of dorsal is fa r behi nd the end of the pectora.ls. The body of the fish is d3. rk grey while the median fins ar e whitish. Fig. 1 I. Pisoodotlophis hora (Hamilton-Ruchanan) Being a very common eel in the fr esh a nd brackish waters of I ndia, it ha s been recorded by Day ( 1889), Ayyar (1932), Hora (1933), Aiyar "al. (19H) , Geor~e and Desai (\9441, and Chacko and Srinivasan (1 954) fr om various parts of I nd ia It i s a widely distributed species and is k nown to oCCllr in South Africa, east coast of Africa, India, Ceylon , Sumatra;. Singapore, Java, Celebes, New Guinea and Formosa. Pisoodonophis cancrivorus (Richardson) This is a rare ee l in th is locality and is represented by only two specimens in the present collection . 'When fresh, it ha s a dark brown hue dorsally, and is light brown on the ventral aspect. The dors al fin origi -nates above the midd le of the pectorals. The teeth are found in bands of seve ra l row s, the intermaxillary being arranged in a sepa rate grou p from the re st. The tai l is about I! times lon ger than t he res t of the body. Fig. 12. Pisoodonophis cancriuorus (Richardson) There is so far no record of thi s species from India n waters, a lthough its known distribut ion is very exten s ive. It is recorded fr om South Africa, Thiadagascar, Arabia, Ceylon, Penang, Singapo re, Celebes, Samoa , Australia, r'hilippines, Uhina aDd Japan. Ophichthy. cephalozona (Bleeker) . This is a. fairly common eel in the bag-n et catches landed at Ver so va. I t seldom occur s in the long-line catches and has no regular [7) 739 JOURNAL, BOMB'Y NATURAL HIST. SOCIETY, Vol. 54 fishelY in Bombay. The body is purplish brown and the deep cross baud on the llape described--' by various authors appears to be les8 conspicuouB dLle to the deep br- own colour of the body. The maximum size recorded is 830 mm.) while the largest specime n in the present collection measured only 44~ mm. in length. Fig. 13. OphichthY$ 'tphalozona (Bleeker) There is no previous record of this species from Indian waters . It has a ' widespread di8tribution in the Indo·Pacific region baving been recorded from Singapore, Ambon, Ceram, New Guinea, Philippines, Australia, China, Formosa and Japan. -Ophichthys apicalis (Benn ett). This species, locally" known as 'devar', is fairly abundant in Sassoon Dock and Versova., being caught always in the bag-net catch es. I t is available throughout the year at \both these places and generally o~curs along wi t,h the small shrimp catches. It is a small vermiform fi sh with greenish tint in f re sh cond ition. Ventrally the colour is more wh itish . The tail is more than It time. the length of the rest of the body. Dorsal commences from above the origin of pectoral. The teeth are uniserial but vomerines ale irregularly distributed. The maximum size tecorded is 430 mm., while the largest specimen observed at Bombay measured 308 mm in length. Fig. 14. Ophichthys apicalis (Bennett) This species is also not recorded from Indian waters although it has been reported from South Africa, Madagascar, Singapore , Java, Celebes, Philippines and China. RI!.PERENCES so far, Ceylon, Aiyar, R. G., Unny, M. M ., and Varkey, P. M. (1944): Studies on the Lepto -cepbal i of Madras coast (Abstract). 31st Ind. Sci. Congress, pp. 106-107. Ayyar, T. V. Ramakrishna (1932): A fi~h pest of the fields along the Coro-mandel coast (Ophichthys boro). ]BNHS., 36 : 276. Berg, Leo S. (1940) : Classification of fishes, both recent and fossil. Trav. Inst. Zool. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R . 5 (2). Cbacko , P. I.. and Srinivasan, R. (1 954) : Hydrobi~logy and Jisherits of th, Vamsatfara Estuary, Govt. Press, Madras. Day, F. (1889) : Fauna of British India, Fishes-J. London , p . 67. Fowler, H. W. (1927) : Notes on some shore fishes from Bombay, ]BNHS., 32 : 253.263. George, C. j., and Desai, N. S. (1944) : The biology of the fishes of the Mahim Creek. Jour. Univ. Bombay. 12: 46. [8] A SYSTEMi\T1C ACCOlJ'IT OF THE EELS OF BOMBAY 740 H dfo rd, A. E. (1910) : Notes on a conger with abnnmai gonads. Jour . iHar. Biol. Assoc. 8, p.3 18. .... _ ___ (1 922) : Report on the work of the steam trawler 'William Carrick'. GOyt· Centra l Press, Bumbay. :-.Jair, R. V. (1946) : On the Leptocephalus -0f Uroconger leptllrlls (R ic!1.) from the ~hdras plankton. Curro Sci. 15 : 318. _ ___ (1947): On the m etamorphosis of t wo Leptocephali from toe i\!adras plankton. Pro,. Ind. Acad. Sci., 25 , pp. 1-1 4. _ ___ (1948) : Lep tocephali of the Gulf of Manaar. Ibid 27: 87. Schmidt, J ohannes (1 906) : Contributi on to the life hi sto ry of eel (An;uilla wlgalis FIero.) Rapp. cons . Expl. Mar" 5, App. 4: 137. -----(191 4) : First rcp0rt on eel invest iga tion, 1913, Rapp. ConsciZ ExfJl. Afar., 19 : 2. - ----(1916) : Second report on eel invest iga tion 1915, Ibid. 22: 1-25. Sorley, H . T. ( 193.!) : M arine fi sheritS of lhe Bombay Presidtncy. Gove Press, .Bom bay . Weber, rvr. , and de Beaufo:t , L. F, ( 1916) : T he fhhes of indo·Australian Arthiptlago. 3 : 240, • [9] i PRINTED AT THE PARAMOUNT PRESS, COCHIN-2. • ( • 

Systematic account of the eels of Bombay

http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/7169/1/197-JOURNAL_OF_THE_BOMBAY_NATURAL_HISTORY_SICIETY_1957.pdf

Systematic account of the eels of Bombay

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CMFRI Digital Repository