Burger, Albert Georg

Ferguson, Gus

McLeod, Kenneth

Biological experiments are published in a series ofonline databases. Due to the inherent complexityof these experiments, their conclusions can be contradictory. This causes the databases to be inconsistent, which creates problems for human users.Previous work looked at creating a system basedon Argumentation to resolve this issue. This workpresents an evaluation of that system, focusing onthe effectiveness of its presentation of argumentsand the result of the argumentation process. Thework shows that the system can be understood byusers, even though their presentation preferencesvary substantially

Using argumentation to resolve conflict in biological databases

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Heriot Watt Pure

Heriot Watt Pure