Recent progress in the construction of the 3rd Generation ECR ion source at the 88" cyclotron in Berkeley is reported. Test results of a full scale prototype superconducting magnet structure, which has been described in the last ECR Ion Source Workshop, lead to an improved coil design for the 3rd Generation ECR ion source. Solenoids of the new design have been fabricated and exceeded the design field values without quench. The new sextupole coils are currently being wound and will be tested this summer. This magnet structure consists of three solenoids and six race track coils with iron poles forming the sextupole. It is described in the report along with the structural support and coil winding specifications. The coils are designed to generate a 4T axial mirror field at injection and 3T at extraction and a radial sextupole field of 2.4 T at the plasma chamber wall. The high axial magnetic field of the 3rd Generation ECR ion source influences ion beam extraction considerably and we have initiated simulations of the extraction and beam transport system in order to enhance transmission through the injection beam line of the 88" cyclotron

Leitner, M A

Lundgren, S A

Lyneis, C M

Taylor, C E

Wutte, D C

CERN Document Server

Progress Report of the 3rd Generation ECR Ion Source FabricationM.A. Leitner, S. A. Lundgren, C.M. Lyneis, C.E. Taylor, D.C. WutteLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USAABSTRACTRecent progress in the construction of the 3rd Generation ECR ionsource at the 88-Inch Cyclotron in Berkeley is reported. Test resultsof a full scale prototype superconducting magnet structure, whichwas described in the last ECR Ion Source Workshop, lead to animproved coil design for the 3rd Generation ECR ion source.Solenoids of the new design have been fabricated and exceeded thedesign field values without quench. The new sextupole coils arecurrently being wound and will be tested this summer. This magnetstructure consists of three solenoids and six race track coils withiron poles forming the sextupole. It is described in the report alongwith the structural support and coil winding specifications. The coilsare designed to generate a 4T axial mirror field at injection and 3Tat extraction and a radial sextupole field of 2.4 T at the plasmachamber wall. The high axial magnetic field of the 3rd GenerationECR ion source influences ion beam extraction considerably and wehave initiated simulations of the extraction and beam transportsystem in order to enhance transmission through the injection beamline of the cyclotron.1. INTRODUCTIONWith the construction of the superconducting 3rdgeneration ECR ion source we expect to furtherenhance the performance of the 88-Inch Cyclotron byproviding more intense highly charged heavy-ionbeams. Higher beam intensities will be requiredespecially for low cross-section experiments for heavy-element research using the new "Berkeley Gas-filledSpectrometer" (BGS) now on line at the cyclotron. Onthe other hand, an increase of the usable mass range upto uranium is desirable for nuclear structure researchusing state-of-the-art gamma-ray detectors such as"Gammasphere".Figure 1 shows the mechanical layout of the ionsource. The plasma chamber is made out of a double-walled aluminum tube with water cooling-channels inbetween. Three or more off-axis microwave feeds aswell as ovens and a biased disk are inserted from theinjection spool. Also shown are the end walls of theiron shielding-yoke, which is designed to reduce themagnetic stray-field outside the yoke to <50 Gauss.Figure 2 shows a cutout of the superconducting coilconfiguration of the 3rd generation ECR ion source,which is designed to generate magnetic fieldsconsiderably greater than those of any existing ECR ionsource. The two outermost solenoids produce an axialmagnetic mirror field, whose center strength can belowered by a third, oppositely polarized solenoid. Thesextupole field is generated by the six racetrack coilswound around a pole piece made of iron and aluminum.Table 1: Design characteristics of the 3rd generation ECRion source magnet structure.ID of plasma chamber 15 cmMirror field on axis 4.0 T (at injection),3.0 T (at extraction)Mirror-mirror spacing 50 cmCentral field 0-1.0 T (variable)Max. radial field, plasma wall 2.4 TMin. field, plasma wall 2.0 TCharacteristic field data - as calculated by the three-dimensional code TOSCA - are summarized in Table 1.The design and fabrication of the magnet structure isbased on a collaborative effort between the 88-Inch          	                                                                                      ﬀ           ﬁ ﬁ         ﬂ  ﬁ       ﬃ   Fig. 1: Mechanical layout of the3rd generation ECR ion source. ! " # $ %  ! " # $ & ! " # $ '( ) * + , - . / ) 0 . 1 /2 3 4 56 7 8 9 : 5 8 9; < = > ? @ A B <C A D >E F @ G H ? @ A B <C A D >Fig. 2: Cutout drawing of the superconducting coil configurationof the 3rd generation ECR ion source.cyclotron of the Nuclear Science Division and theSupercon Group in the Accelerator and FusionResearch Division at Lawrence Berkeley NationalLaboratory.2. NEW MAGNET DESIGN FOR THE3RD GENERATION ECR ION SOURCESince the most critical technology of the 3rdgeneration ECR ion source centers on the design,fabrication, and performance of these superconductingcoils, we built and tested a prototype magnet systemutilizing surplus wire from the "Superconducting SuperCollider" (SSC). Results of the magnet test werereported in [1]. Coil #1 (at the injection side, see Fig. 2)reached only 71% of its design value, while coil #2 and#3 reached their design values. In addition, the trainingbehavior of the sextupole coils under combined testswith the axial mirror coils indicated movement ofindividual sextupole coils caused by Lorentz forces,thus limiting the maximum magnetic field. Theseresults led to a new, improved coil design for the 3rdgeneration ECR ion source.2.1 Mechanical Design of the New Solenoids andSupport StructureSolenoid coil #1 is designed to produce a peakmagnetic field of 4 T at the injection side. Its prototypehad a graded design with two different superconductingwires: Wire with lower copper/superconductor ratio of1.3 (compared to 1.8 for the outer section) had beenused for the inner coil region. The purpose of thisarrangement was to reduce the current density carriedby the superconductor on the inner side of the coil,where the magnetic field is highest.A preliminary structural analysis had shown thatstresses in the coil might be too large to be supportedentirely by the conventional prototype coil bobbin.Therefore, the prototype design relied on the strengthand stiffness of the epoxy-potted windings. However,because of the coil thickness in radial direction, thestresses became too high. Consequently, coil #1reached only 71% of its designed field value.Therefore, the shape as well as the structural support ofthe coil had to be improved.The experiences with the prototype magnet-structure lead to a new bobbin design, which is shownin Fig. 1. It is much thicker than the prototype design,improving the axial support for the mirror coils and theradial compression for the sextupole coils (seefollowing section). The new design incorporates a 340mm inner-diameter axial-solenoid winding compared to300 mm for the prototype design to allow space for astructural compression cylinder over the sextupole coil.Space is also provided for approximately 10 mm totalradial thickness for a structural support bandsurrounding the solenoid coils. Aluminum alloy wirewith rectangular cross section, similar in size to thesuperconductor, is wound over the coil OD for addedstructural support. This wire is “wet wound” with filledStycast and with fiberglass between layers. Details ofthe required winding tensions for the structural bandingare given in [4].Furthermore, the new design uses only one type ofwire for the solenoid coils. A rectangularsuperconducting wire is used to increase the coppercontent in the coil (while still maintaining a similarcurrent density), because quench tests with the magnetprototype showed that the surplus SSC wire did notcontain enough copper for stable operation. The coilshape has been changed to reduce stresses on thesolenoids: The new coils are wider and thinner.Operating conditions of the new solenoid wire aresummarized in Table 2.Table 2: Operating conditions of the new superconductingsolenoid wire.Cross section 1.650 mm x 0.875 mmrectangularCurrent 215 ACurrent density 120 A / sq. mmCurrent margin 2.63 (coil #1), 3.12 (coil #2),4.06 (coil #3)Cu/Sc ratio 4Total number of turns 6272 (coil #1), 4480 (coil #2),2208 (coil #3)The assembly of the solenoid structure was finishedin September 1998. Magnet tests were performed in anexisting test-cryostat, and the coils exceeded thedesign-current values without quench. Because ofpower-supply limitation, the maximum current densitywas not evaluated.2.2 Mechanical Design of the Sextupole Coils and theirSupport StructureThe sextupole design of the 3rd generation ECR ionsource incorporates two unique features as compared toother superconducting ECR sources:1. The use of iron poles (see Fig. 2) in thesuperconducting sextupole structure increases themaximum sextupole field by ~10% and decreasesthe axial field in the center region.2. The ends of the sextupole have been extended inaxial direction away from the solenoid coils toreduce the forces on the end sections, where theyare highest (see [1], [2]).The prototype sextupole magnet reached 104% ofits design current when tested alone, but achieved only95% in combined tests with the axial coils. Duringthese tests the axial coils have been excited to only60%(coil #1) and 80%(coil #2) of its design values dueto the limitations of coil #1. The sextupole quenchedseveral times before training up to the stated currentlevels. This training behavior is believed to be relatedto movement of individual coils caused by the Lorentzforces.A sample of the superconducting wire-epoxyassembly from a spare sextupole coil was analyzed inrespect to its thermal contraction characteristics. Theresults [3] are summarized in Table 3 together withcontraction values for copper, iron, stainless steel andaluminum:The most likely explanation for the sextupolemovement is that the thermal contraction of thesextupole coils was too large to maintain the prestresson the coils applied by the aluminum clamping ring, asshown in Fig. 3. After cooling, the center sections mayhave been poorly constrained in the azimuthal directionand this made macroscopic movements of the coilspossible.Table 3: Average integrated thermal contractions from 293 K to 77K for a coil specimen of a prototype sextupole-winding. Comparisondata are given for copper, iron, stainless steel and aluminumParallel to strands 0.280 %Normal to strands, normal tointerlayer glass0.674 %Normal to strands, parallel tointerlayer glass0.491 %Copper 101 OFHC 0.303 %Iron 0.197 %Stainless steel 316 0.281 %Aluminum 6061 0.391 %Therefore, a new superconducting sextupole designhas been developed, which provides greater prestress tothe sextupole. As described above the larger diametersolenoid allows space for a structural compressioncylinder over the sextupole coil. The sextupole coil’snominal OD is 272 mm which allows space for a 14mm thick compression cylinder (and 20 mm solenoidbobbin). The new superconducting sextupole wire hasmore favorable thermal contraction properties (seeTable 4) than the previously used one. Consequentlythe outer aluminum ring has a higher thermalcontraction than the coil and a compressive radialpressure occurs at the coil outer perimeter when themagnet is cooled to cryogenic temperatures. Additionalsupport comes from pre-stretched stainless steel wirewound over the wet-wound sextupole windings.Table 4: Average integrated thermal contractions from293 K to 77 K for a coil specimen of the new sextupole winding.Parallel to strands 0.283 %Normal to strands, normal tointerlayer glass0.444 %Normal to strands, parallel tointerlayer glass0.381 %After the structural cylinder has been installed onthe sextupole coil and machined to its final size(nominally 300 mm), the solenoid bobbin ID, with theaxial coils in place, has to be machined to acceptinsertion of the sextupole assembly. Maximumclearance should be 0.005 inches on the diameter.The stainless-steel end parts of the prototype havebeen replaced with pieces made of aluminum, as shownin Fig. 2 to match the thermal contraction properties ofthe sextupole pole pieces to the superconducting wiresbetter. Iron has less thermal contraction than thesuperconductor does (parallel to the strands) andaluminum has more thermal contraction (see Table 3).This combination results in less longitudinal stress onthe sextupole windings after cool-down.A further prestress enhancement of the sextupolestructure is achieved by inserting a “bladder” betweenthe coil windings and as well at the end section. Theprinciple of the “bladder” is explained in Fig. 4. Abladder made from welded stainless steel sheets isinserted between the windings. Then liquid Incaloymetal at 120 degrees Fahrenheit is pumped into thebladder under 1000 psi pressure and let cool down. Thisnew method allows efficient prestressing of thesextupole structure to minimize coil movements underthe strong magnetic fields of the axial solenoids.Operating conditions of the new sextupole wire aresummarized in Table 5: The sextupole coil winding hasbegun and will be completed beginning of June. Aftertesting of the sextupole magnets the source-cryostatfabrication will begin. Special high-Tc current leadswill be used between helium and liquid nitrogentemperature to minimize the heat leak. Most of the heatFig. 3: The training behavior of the prototype sextupoleindicated movement of individual coils caused by theLorentz forces. After cooling, the center sections mayhave been poorly constrained in the azimuthaldirection and this made macroscopic movements of thecoils possible.load into the cryostat comes from these currentfeedthroughs. We plan to use two cryocoolers tomaintain the required He as well as LN temperature.The design of the conventional ECR sourcecomponents and a new beam line for the injection intothe cyclotron is already under way. In addition, we areevaluating options for commercially availablemicrowave tubes from 14 GHz to 28 GHz. Most likely,we will start operation of the superconducting ECR ionsource by using an 18 GHz amplifier system. Firstbeam injection into the cyclotron is planned in the year2001.Table 5: Operating conditions of the new sextupole wire.Cross section 1.9 mm x 1.0 mm rectangularCurrent 429 ACurrent density 200 A / sq. mmCurrent margin 1.75Cu/Sc ratio 3Total number of turns 648 (per sextupole coil)3. BEAM TRANSPORT LINEThe magnetic design of the 3rd generation ECR ionsource has a maximum axial field of 3 T at theextraction side. Due to the size of the superconductingcoils, the distance from the plasma outlet aperture tothe exit of the iron shielding yoke is about 30 cm. Atfull coil excitation the axial magnetic field drops from3T to 0.4 T within this distance. The axial magneticfield then drops further below 20 G within the next 30cm. Therefore ion beam formation takes place in astrong magnetic field. Its influence cannot be omitted inthe ion optics layout.The maximum extraction energy out of the ECR ionsource is defined by the injection energy into thecyclotron, which is presently designed for 10-15 keV.This puts difficult requirements on the beam transportsection, where we have to transport several mA ofheavy ions to the analyzing magnet and then up toseveral hundred eµA through the axial injection line ofthe cyclotron. Therefore, we have initiated simulationsof the extraction and beam transport system in order toenhance transmission through the beam line and arealso considering other center-region geometries, whichcould operate with higher injection voltages.The influence of the high magnetic field on the ionbeam extraction and matching to the beam line hasbeen investigated in [5]. The extraction system hasbeen first simulated with the 2D ion-trajectory codeIGUN with an estimated mean charge state of theextracted ion beam. These results have then beencompared with the 2D code AXCEL-INP, which cansimulate the extraction of ions with different chargestates. It could be verified that by using the rightnormalization of the current contribution of each chargestate, as described in [5], it is possible to simulate theextraction system with a single, mean charge state. Inthis way, the simulation of the extraction is simplifiedconsiderably.Figure 5 shows typical simulation results fordifferent charge states. The charge state distribution(CSD) used in these simulations is summarized inTable 6. It can be clearly seen that different chargestates focus differently in the high magnetic field of asuperconducting ECR ion source. This leads to typicalemittance patterns, where each charge state is orientedFig. 5: Different charge states focus differently in the highmagnetic field of a superconducting ECR ion source.The dotted line represents the axial magnetic fieldstrength.IKJ L MON P Q RTS U P Q V P N J WX Y Z [W \ W ]Z ^NXJ W _ ` J L a a W U bc d e f g h i j kl m n o pq r s tvuw x yz { | }~         Fig. 4: A further prestress enhancement of the sextupolestructure is achieved by inserting a “bladder”between the coil windings and as well at the endsectiondifferently in the r-r’ phase space. Such a phase spaceplot is shown in Fig. 6, again demonstrating how thecharge states focus differently in the axial magneticfield.Table 6: CSD optimized for Ar16+ with oxygen gas mixing, extractedout of the AECR-U ion source. The CSD is corrected for transportlosses (current estimates were made for the lower charge statesbelow Ar5+).Charge state Ar - CSD[eµA]O2 - CSD[eµA]16 1715 4514 6913 7812 8511 7510 649 578 507 49 486 45 975 40 804 38 723 35 702 30 701 25 70Σ = 802 µA Σ = 507 µAThis behavior must be considered in the design ofthe beam transport line. The use of a movableextraction system as well as additional focusingelements is necessary to match the beam to thespectrometer acceptance. We have developed a firstbeam line layout. The design consists of a Glaser lens(0.6 m downstream from the plasma outlet aperture)and a double focusing sector magnet (2.4 mdownstream from the plasma outlet aperture). The first30 cm have been calculated with IGUN for Ar9+ withthe CSD of Table 6. The output beam parameters fromIGUN at z= 30 cm have been used as input parametersfor the matrix-code TRACE-2D, which allows tooptimize the beam line. By combining these twocomputer codes, we are able to consistently simulatethe beam from the plasma meniscus through the beamline. Further simulations are necessary to improvetransmission at higher current levels.5. REFERENCES[1] C.M. Lyneis, Z.Q. Xie, C.E. Taylor: “Development of the thirdgeneration electron cyclotron resonance ion source”,Rev.Sci.Instrum. 69, 682 (1998)[2] C.M. Lyneis, Z.Q. Xie, C.E. Taylor: “Design of the 3rdGeneration ECR Ion Source”, Proceedings of the 13th InternationalWorkshop on ECR Ion Sources, Texas A&M University, USA(1997), p.115[3] K. Chow, LBNL Engineering Note, SCMAG-599[4] C.E. Taylor, LBNL Engineering Note, SCMAG-615[5] D. Wutte, M.A. Leitner, C.M. Lyneis, C.E. Taylor, Z.Q. Xie:“Design Study of the Extraction System of the 3rd Generation ECRIon Source”, to be published in the Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Heavy-Ion Accelerator Technology,Chicago, USA (1998)Fig. 6: Different charge states focus differently in the high magnetic field of a superconducting ECR ion source. This leads to typicalemittance patterns (at z=15 cm from the outlet aperture), where each charge state is oriented differently in the r-r’ phase space.

Progress report of the third Generation ECR ion source fabrication

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

CERN Document Server