In this article Denis Diderot's Fifth Memoir of 1748 on the problem of a
pendulum damped by air resistance is discussed. Diderot wrote the Memoir in
order to clarify an assumption Newton made without further justification in the
first pages of the Principia in connection with an experiment to verify the
Third Law of Motion using colliding pendulums. To explain the differences
between experimental and theoretical values of momentum in the collision
experiments he conducted Newton assumed that the bob was retarded by an air
resistance FR proportional to the velocity v. By giving Newton's arguments
a mathematical scaffolding and recasting his geometrical reasoning in the
language of differential calculus, Diderot provides a step-by-step solution
guide to the problem and proposes experiments to settle the question about the
appropriate form of FR, which for Diderot quadratic in v, that is FR∼v2.
The solution of Diderot is presented in full detail and his results are
compared to those obtained from a Lindstedt-Poincare approximation for an
oscillator with quadratic damping. It is shown that, up to a prefactor, both
coincide. Some results that one can derive from his approach are presented and
discussed for the first time. Experimental evidence to support Diderot's or
Newton's claims is discussed together with the limitations of their solutions.
Some misprints in the original memoir are pointed out.Comment: 31 pages, 8 figures. Submitted to European Physical Journal