This paper investigates the impact of query topology on the difficulty of
answering conjunctive queries in the presence of OWL 2 QL ontologies. Our first
contribution is to clarify the worst-case size of positive existential (PE),
non-recursive Datalog (NDL), and first-order (FO) rewritings for various
classes of tree-like conjunctive queries, ranging from linear queries to
bounded treewidth queries. Perhaps our most surprising result is a
superpolynomial lower bound on the size of PE-rewritings that holds already for
linear queries and ontologies of depth 2. More positively, we show that
polynomial-size NDL-rewritings always exist for tree-shaped queries with a
bounded number of leaves (and arbitrary ontologies), and for bounded treewidth
queries paired with bounded depth ontologies. For FO-rewritings, we equate the
existence of polysize rewritings with well-known problems in Boolean circuit
complexity. As our second contribution, we analyze the computational complexity
of query answering and establish tractability results (either NL- or
LOGCFL-completeness) for a range of query-ontology pairs. Combining our new
results with those from the literature yields a complete picture of the
succinctness and complexity landscapes for the considered classes of queries
and ontologies.Comment: This is an extended version of a paper accepted at LICS'15. It
contains both succinctness and complexity results and adopts FOL notation.
The appendix contains proofs that had to be omitted from the conference
version for lack of space. The previous arxiv version (a long version of our
DL'14 workshop paper) only contained the succinctness results and used
description logic notatio
