This paper is about two related decision theoretic problems, nonparametric
two-sample testing and independence testing. There is a belief that two
recently proposed solutions, based on kernels and distances between pairs of
points, behave well in high-dimensional settings. We identify different sources
of misconception that give rise to the above belief. Specifically, we
differentiate the hardness of estimation of test statistics from the hardness
of testing whether these statistics are zero or not, and explicitly discuss a
notion of "fair" alternative hypotheses for these problems as dimension
increases. We then demonstrate that the power of these tests actually drops
polynomially with increasing dimension against fair alternatives. We end with
some theoretical insights and shed light on the \textit{median heuristic} for
kernel bandwidth selection. Our work advances the current understanding of the
power of modern nonparametric hypothesis tests in high dimensions.Comment: 19 pages, 9 figures, published in AAAI-15: The 29th AAAI Conference
on Artificial Intelligence (with author order reversed from ArXiv
