We introduce and study a new model of interactive proofs: AM(k), or
Arthur-Merlin with k non-communicating Merlins. Unlike with the better-known
MIP, here the assumption is that each Merlin receives an independent random
challenge from Arthur. One motivation for this model (which we explore in
detail) comes from the close analogies between it and the quantum complexity
class QMA(k), but the AM(k) model is also natural in its own right.
We illustrate the power of multiple Merlins by giving an AM(2) protocol for
3SAT, in which the Merlins' challenges and responses consist of only
n^{1/2+o(1)} bits each. Our protocol has the consequence that, assuming the
Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), any algorithm for approximating a dense CSP
with a polynomial-size alphabet must take n^{(log n)^{1-o(1)}} time. Algorithms
nearly matching this lower bound are known, but their running times had never
been previously explained. Brandao and Harrow have also recently used our 3SAT
protocol to show quasipolynomial hardness for approximating the values of
certain entangled games.
In the other direction, we give a simple quasipolynomial-time approximation
algorithm for free games, and use it to prove that, assuming the ETH, our 3SAT
protocol is essentially optimal. More generally, we show that multiple Merlins
never provide more than a polynomial advantage over one: that is, AM(k)=AM for
all k=poly(n). The key to this result is a subsampling theorem for free games,
which follows from powerful results by Alon et al. and Barak et al. on
subsampling dense CSPs, and which says that the value of any free game can be
closely approximated by the value of a logarithmic-sized random subgame.Comment: 48 page
