Is there a characteristic of coordination languages that makes them
qualitatively different from general programming languages and deserves special
academic attention? This report proposes a nuanced answer in three parts. The
first part highlights that coordination languages are the means by which
composite software applications can be specified using components that are only
available separately, or later in time, via standard interfacing mechanisms.
The second part highlights that most currently used languages provide
mechanisms to use externally provided components, and thus exhibit some
elements of coordination. However not all do, and the availability of an
external interface thus forms an objective and qualitative criterion that
distinguishes coordination. The third part argues that despite the qualitative
difference, the segregation of academic attention away from general language
design and implementation has non-obvious cost trade-offs.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures, 3 table