Spreading processes represent a very efficient tool to investigate the
structural properties of networks and the relative importance of their
constituents, and have been widely used to this aim in static networks. Here we
consider simple disease spreading processes on empirical time-varying networks
of contacts between individuals, and compare the effect of several immunization
strategies on these processes. An immunization strategy is defined as the
choice of a set of nodes (individuals) who cannot catch nor transmit the
disease. This choice is performed according to a certain ranking of the nodes
of the contact network. We consider various ranking strategies, focusing in
particular on the role of the training window during which the nodes'
properties are measured in the time-varying network: longer training windows
correspond to a larger amount of information collected and could be expected to
result in better performances of the immunization strategies. We find instead
an unexpected saturation in the efficiency of strategies based on nodes'
characteristics when the length of the training window is increased, showing
that a limited amount of information on the contact patterns is sufficient to
design efficient immunization strategies. This finding is balanced by the large
variations of the contact patterns, which strongly alter the importance of
nodes from one period to the next and therefore significantly limit the
efficiency of any strategy based on an importance ranking of nodes. We also
observe that the efficiency of strategies that include an element of randomness
and are based on temporally local information do not perform as well but are
largely independent on the amount of information available