Pareto-efficient climate agreements

Abstract

Recent contributions show that climate agreements with broad participation can be implemented as weakly renegotiation-proof equilibria in simple models of greenhouse gas abatement where each country has a binary choice between cooperating (i.e., abate emissions) or defecting (no abatement). Here we show that this result carries over to a model where countries have a continuum of emission choices. Indeed, a Pareto-efficient climate agreement can always be implemented as a weakly renegotiation-proof equilibrium, for a sufficiently high discount factor. This means that one need not trade-off a “narrow but deep” treaty with a “broad but shallow” treaty.Climate; non-cooperative game-theory; repeated games; weakly renegotiation-proof agreements

    Similar works

    Full text

    thumbnail-image

    Available Versions

    Last time updated on 24/10/2014