53207

KIM, Mikyoung

English

R-Cube Ritsumeikan Research Repository

Hiroshima Memory and Japanese Pacifist DebatesRitsumeikan Asia Pacific University, RCAPS SeminarJuly 19, 2010©M. K. KimHiroshima City University-Hiroshima Peace InstituteHiroshima Bombing: 1945-8-6, 8:15 a.m.Japan in the Contemporary World (1)1868: Meiji Restoration1876: Treaty of Kwanghwa signed with Korea1894: Anglo-Japanese Commercial Treaty1894-5: First Sino-Japanese War1895: Treaty of Shimonoseki signed1902: Anglo-Japanese Alliance signed1904-5: Russo-Japanese War1912: Death of Meiji and beginning of Taisho eraJapan in the Contemporary World (2)1914: Japan enters WWI with Britain and its allies1915: Japan presents China with its 21 Demands1923: Tokyo Earthquake1926: Death of Emperor Taisho and beginning of Showa era1931: Manchurian Incident1933: Japan withdraws from League of Nations1940: Triparitite Pact signed with Germany and Italy (“Axis Powers”)1941: Soviet-Japan Neutrality Pact signedJapan in the Contemporary World (3)1941: Japanese attack Pearl Harbor, the Malay Peninsula and the Philippines; war declared against the U.S., Great Britain, and the Netherlands; the Pacific War begins1942: Allied fleet defeats Japan in the Battle of MidwayAugust 6, 1945: Atomic bomb dropped in Hiroshima (“Little Boy”)August 9, 1945: Atomic bomb dropped in Nagasaki (“Fat Man”)August 15, 1945: Japan surrenders by the terms of Potsdam Declaration and occupation by the Allied Powers (1945-52)The A-Bomb Aftermaths*Total CasualtiesKorean CasualtiesVictims (Instant Deaths)Victims (Instant Deaths){Survivors} [Returnees] [Living in Japan][Living in Korea]Hiroshima 420,000 159,283 50,000 30,000 20,000 15,000 5,000Nagasaki 271,500 73,884 20,000 10,000 10,000 8,000 2,000Total 691,500 233,167 70,000 40,000 30,000 23,000 7,000 2,650The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum (1): A Brief ChronologyMar., 1952: The Hiroshima Peace Memorial City Construction Law passed.Aug., 1955: The Peace Memorial Hall and the Peace Memorial Museum open.Aug., 1991: The renovated Peace Memorial Museum opens. June,1994: The renovated Peace Memorial Hall opens.*2007-: Another renovation project underway to be completed in 2010The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum (2): Connecting the Past to PresentMay 1955-June 2006: About 53 million people visited the museum.About 70 percent of visitors are on school field trip.About 70 percent of foreign visitors at 15 percent out of the total are Americans.Memory War at the Museum, 1985-94 (1)1985: The City gov’t announces the museum renovation plans.May,’87：Progressive citizens’ groups requested the installment of “Aggressors Corner”for the renovation project.*Memory War at the Museum, 1985-94 (2)August, 87: Local Korean hibakusha* support groups asked for the inclusion of the suffering of the Korean victims.**October, 87: The City announces its plan to include the “Aggressor’s Corner” at the expanded space stirring strong opposition from the bereaved families and conservative local politicians.Memory War at the Museum, 1985-94 (3)March ‘88: The City decides to drop the new Corner idea.May ‘88: The City officially announces the plan.Memory War at the Museum, 1985-94 (4): Why was the Corner Idea Dropped?“We couldn’t have such a thing here. The aggressors are in Tokyo. Our only aim is to show what happened on August 6, 1945....It was important to explain the past on a level that the young could understand. The young no longer read, so you have to present them with visual information…You see, this museum was not really intended to be a museum. It was built by survivors as a place of prayer for the victims and for world peace. Mankind must build a better world. That is why Hiroshima must persist. We must go back to the basic roots. We must think of human solidarity and world peace. Otherwise we just end up arguing about history.”Memory War at the Museum, 1985-94 (5): New PanelsMarch ‘93: The Committee on the panel contents at the East Hall convenes.May ‘93: A new panel “Hiroshima Before and After the War” is decided to be installed.Hiroshima Until the Atomic Bombing Panel (after 1994 renovation): “During the Edo Period (1603-1867), Hiroshima City was the leading castle town in the Ch-ugoku and Shikoku regions. During the Meiji Restoration (1868), Hiroshima City was redeveloped as the capital of the Hiroshima Prefecture. Built on a delta, boasting the three natural treasures of sea, rivers and mountains, and graced by large trees, the city attracted schools and businesses and developed thriving commercial districts. However, the steady accumulation of various military facilitiesindicated that Hiroshima was developing two faces: academic and military. The heavy industriesthat began to develop in the 1920s had turned into military plants by the latter half of the 1930s. Prior to the atomic bombing, the entire harbor on taken on the military ambience of the Kure naval base.*Memory War at the Museum, 1985-94 (6): On Foreign HabikushaForced Labor Program for Ethnic Minorities (Panel A2203b)“The National Mobilization Law of April 1938 led in July 1939 to an outright order to mobilize available workers. …Many forced laborers survived extremely harsh working conditions only to die in the atomic bombing.”Hiroshima, the Pacifist Hero?“The damage done by the A-bomb was so catastrophic that this conviction was deeply rooted in the minds of the people of Hiroshima; humanity cannot coexist with nuclear weapons and their use must not be allowed. Based on this conviction- the Spirit of Hiroshima, an unwavering hope for the abolition of nuclear weapons and the realization of lasting world peace, the city of Hiroshima turned toward the world and began its journey on a path to peace.”*Hiroshima, the A-Bomb Victim?Hiroshima is a city on which an atomic bomb was dropped.Hiroshima is a city with many memorials for the lives lost.Hiroshima is a city which continually seeks peace.Everyone, please, look at Hiroshima’s path over the last century.Distant memories, bitter remorse and alarm at an age past.Everyone, please, look at what the atomic bomb brought.Suffering, pain, anger and apprehension toward an uncertain future.…Hiroshima,in this nuclear age, will continue holding high the flame of hope.*Hiroshima: Victim or Hero“A narrative with Hiroshima at the center became the key interpretation of war memory in Japan.... the museum does represent Japan’s tendency to be highly selective in acknowledging only Japanese victims from among all the victims of World War II.”*Distancing Hiroshima from Japan by directly linking the city to the world as the torch-bearer of anti-nuclear pacifist movement.Memory and Culture (1)“...memory appears as the almost direct expression of a national mentality, indicative of a nation’s ability to mourn, to learn and to mature (by overcoming narrow nationalistic perspectives). The language of temporality thus produces the familiar image of the interpretation of the past as a matter of national culture.”*Memory and Culture (2)“Hollow Center”: Beginning with the Japanese mythology, the structure of Japanese culture, society and human relations are characterized by the emptiness at the center. When forces confront one another on either side of this empty center, the emptiness serves as a buffer zone preventing the confrontation from growing too intense.* (Kawai hayao 1982)“Ethos of Social Relativism”: Rather than there being a single social reality, a number of possible perspectives of both self and social life are acknowledged. Interaction in Japanese society then focuses on the definition of the appropriate choice, out of all the various possibilities. This means that what one says and does will be different in different situations, depending on how one defines one’s particular perspective versus the social other.* (Doi Takeo 1987)Memory and Culture (3)“Situational Logic”:conflict avoidance (temporary pacification) over conflict resolution (permanent reconciliation) * (Sugiyama Takie 1984)Japan and Hiroshima: Peace, Pacifism and Peace MovementPacifism, a meta-ideology, should remain as time- and context-defying moral principle.Peace as a sub-concept of pacifism is open to transmutations. The Hiroshima experience reminds us that the definition of peace is dictated by the changing contextual and temporal specifications.An ideology such as pacifism maintains its ethical foundations being relatively independent of strategic calculations, whereas a movement fluctuates with political opportunity structure.* The controversies regarding the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum are a story of political compromise as a form of tactical innovation distancing itself from the core contents of pacifist ideology.Importance of Historical Memory in International Relations (%)Japan KoreaVery Important21 32Important 46 58Not Very Important24 9Not Important4 1Others 5 0

Hiroshima Memory Debates and Japanese Pacifist Debates(Power Point)

https://ritsumei.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/12527/files/RCAPS20100719.pdf

Hiroshima Memory Debates and Japanese Pacifist Debates(Power Point)

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

R-Cube Ritsumeikan Research Repository