References

Abstract

Acknowledgments We acknowledge useful discussions with Heiko Rieger, David Lancaster and Giorgio Parisi. J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo is supported by an EC HMC(ERBFMBICT950429) grant. 10 Figure 4: D as a function of r for T = 0:45, L = 128. The line is our best fit to the behavior D(r) = c1P (r) + c2 by using data with 3 ^ r ^ 45. where errors have been evaluated by using the jack-knife method. The value of the residual O/2 (per degree of freedom) is very good, close to 0:2 (but since the data points are very correlated the number does not have necessarily a deep meaning). The agreement with the renormalization group prediction (see equation (21)) is very good. Our best numerical estimate for d\Lambda is ssc1=24