CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
research
Acupuncture and moxibustion for lateral elbow pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Authors
S Bangrazi
ZX Bian
+8 more
KF Chung
M Gadau
H Liu
YS Tan
FC Wang
WF Yeung
C Zaslawski
SP Zhang
Publication date
1 January 2014
Publisher
'Springer Science and Business Media LLC'
Doi
View
on
PubMed
Abstract
Background: Acupuncture and moxibustion have widely been used to treat lateral elbow pain (LEP). A comprehensive systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including both English and Chinese databases was conducted to assess the efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of LEP.Methods: Revised STRICTA (2010) criteria were used to appraise the acupuncture procedures, the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. A total of 19 RCTs that compared acupuncture and/or moxibustion with sham acupuncture, another form of acupuncture, or conventional treatment were included.Results: All studies had at least one domain rated as high risk or uncertain risk of bias in the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Results from three RCTs of moderate quality showed that acupuncture was more effective than sham acupuncture. Results from 10 RCTs of mostly low quality showed that acupuncture or moxibustion was superior or equal to conventional treatment, such as local anesthetic injection, local steroid injection, non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs, or ultrasound. There were six low quality RCTs that compared acupuncture and moxibustion combined with manual acupuncture alone, and all showed that acupuncture and moxibustion combined was superior to manual acupuncture alone.Conclusion: Moderate quality studies suggest that acupuncture is more effective than sham acupuncture. Interpretations of findings regarding acupuncture vs. conventional treatment, and acupuncture and moxibustion combined vs. manual acupuncture alone are limited by the methodological qualities of these studies. Future studies with improved methodological design are warranted to confirm the efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion for LEP. © 2014 Gadau et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
OPUS - University of Technology Sydney
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:opus.lib.uts.edu.au:10453/...
Last time updated on 13/02/2017
Crossref
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
info:doi/10.1186%2F1472-6882-1...
Last time updated on 01/04/2019
Springer - Publisher Connector
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
Last time updated on 05/06/2019
HKU Scholars Hub
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:hub.hku.hk:10722/198780
Last time updated on 01/06/2016