Bricolage Strategies, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Geographic Expansion of Social Enterprises

Abstract

Data availability statement: The data are not publicly available due to ethical, legal, or other concerns.Supplementary Material is available online at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/08997640241262225#supplementary-materials . For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.Social enterprises (SEs), hybrid entities balancing revenue generation and social or environmental goals, often employ bricolage due to resource constraints. Interviews with 37 SE managers unveiled two pivotal bricolage strategies—utilizing SE status–related marketing resources and leveraging available technological resources—as well as how their interplay influences geographical expansion and the contingent roles of stakeholder participation in facilitating their impact. Quantitative studies of 778 U.K. SEs confirm that the predominant facilitator of geographic expansion is the utilization of status-related marketing resources, surpassing the impact of leveraging available technological resources. SEs’ efforts to utilize SE status–related marketing resources should be harmonized with community participation, whereas SEs aiming to leverage available technological resources should align their efforts with employee participation. We also underscore the substitution dynamic between these two bricolage strategies. However, SEs prioritizing employee participation are better positioned to mitigate the challenges arising from this substitution than those emphasizing community participation.The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article