Association of the International Journal of Central Banking
Abstract
We argue that uncertainty over the impact of macroprudential policy need not make a policymaker more cautious. Our
starting point is the classic finding of Brainard that uncertainty
over the impact of a policy instrument will make a policymaker
less active. This result is challenged in a series of richer models
designed to take into account the more complex reality faced by
a macroprudential policymaker. We find that asymmetries in
policy objectives, the presence of unquantifiable sources of risk,
the ability to learn from policy, and private-sector uncertainty
over policy objectives can all lead to more active policy