BACKGROUND: The very long-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) are largely unclear. We linked 20-years outcomes of two randomized trials to evaluate re-intervention and mortality outcomes for on-pump CABG, off-pump CABG and PCI. METHODS: A data linkage project was performed using data as registered within the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR), Statistics Netherlands (CBS) and the Octopus trials. Between 1998 and 2000, these trials randomized patients with coronary artery disease to on-pump versus off-pump CABG (OctoPump trial), or to PCI versus off-pump CABG (OctoStent trial). With data linkage, the original 5 years follow-up time for clinical events was extended to 20 years, including mortality and coronary reinterventions. RESULTS: After 20 years, in the OctoPump trial all-cause mortality was 50.0% after on-pump, and 46.5% after off-pump CABG. There was no difference in the combined outcome of mortality and re-interventions (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.59-1.12). In the OctoStent trial, all-cause mortality was 56.7% after PCI and 52.5% after off-pump CABG. There was no difference in the combined outcome of mortality and re-interventions (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.04). Off-pump CABG patients underwent less re-interventions than PCI patients (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.80). CONCLUSION: This study revealed no differences in 20-year survival between patients randomized to on-pump versus off-pump CABG, or to PCI versus off-pump-CABG. However, off-pump CABG patients underwent less re-interventions than PCI patients
