CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Research
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Imageability ratings across languages
Authors
A. Rofes Zakariás, L. Ceder, K. Lind, M. Johansson, M.B. de Aguiar, V. Bjekić, J. Fyndanis, V. Gavarró, A. Simonsen, H.G. Sacristán, C.H. Kambanaros, M. Kraljević, J.K. Martínez-Ferreiro, S. Mavis, İ. Orellana, C.M. Sör, I. Lukács, Á. Tunçer, M. Vuksanović, J. Ibarrola, A.M. Pourquie, M. Varlokosta, S. Howard, D.
Publication date
1 January 2018
Publisher
Abstract
Imageability is a psycholinguistic variable that indicates how well a word gives rise to a mental image or sensory experience. Imageability ratings are used extensively in psycholinguistic, neuropsychological, and aphasiological studies. However, little formal knowledge exists about whether and how these ratings are associated between and within languages. Fifteen imageability databases were cross-correlated using nonparametric statistics. Some of these corresponded to unpublished data collected within a European research network—the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists (COST IS1208). All but four of the correlations were significant. The average strength of the correlations (rho =.68) and the variance explained (R2 = 46%) were moderate. This implies that factors other than imageability may explain 54% of the results. Imageability ratings often correlate across languages. Different possibly interacting factors may explain the moderate strength and variance explained in the correlations: (1) linguistic and cultural factors; (2) intrinsic differences between the databases; (3) range effects; (4) small numbers of words in each database, equivalent words, and participants; and (5) mean age of the participants. The results suggest that imageability ratings may be used cross-linguistically. However, further understanding of the factors explaining the variance in the correlations will be needed before research and practical recommendations can be made. © 2017, Psychonomic Society, Inc
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Pergamos : Unified Institutional Repository / Digital Library Platform of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:lib.uoa.gr:uoadl:2983157
Last time updated on 10/02/2023