CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: An Empirical Approach to Defining Treatment Response and Remission in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Authors
Bekir B. Artukoglu
Fernando R. Asbahr
+40 more
Michael H. Bloch
Sandra L. Cepeda
Jonathan S. Comer
Miguel Euripides C.
Luis C. Farhat
Daniel Fatori
Martin E. Franklin
Jennifer B. Freeman
Daniel A. Geller
Wayne K. Goodman
Paul J. Grant
Isobel Heyman
Tord Ivarsson
Jessica A. Johnson
Angeli Landeros-Weisenberger
Fabian Lenhard
Jessica L.S. Levine
Adam B. Lewin
Fenghua Li
David Mataix-Cols
Lisa J. Merlo
Hamid Mohsenabadi
Tara S. Peris
John Piacentini
Divya Ramakrishnan
Ana Isabel Rosa-Alcázar
Ángel Rosa-Alcázar
Michelle Rozenman
Jeffrey J. Sapyta
Eva Serlachius
Mohammad J. Shabani
Roseli G. Shavitt
Gudmundur Skarphedinsson
Brent J. Small
Eric A. Storch
Susan E. Swedo
Per Hove Thomsen
Cynthia Turner
Edoardo F. Q. Vattimo
Bernhard Weidle
Publication date
1 January 2022
Publisher
'Elsevier BV'
Abstract
©. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the, Submitted, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. To access the final edited and published work see: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2021.05.027Objective: A lack of universal definitions for response and remission in pediatric obsessive- compulsive disorder (OCD) has hampered the comparability of results across trials. To address this problem, we conducted an individual participant data diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis to evaluate the discriminative ability of the Children’s Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) in determining response and remission. We also aimed to generate empirically derived cutoffs on the CY-BOCS for these outcomes. Method: A systematic review of PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and CENTRAL identified 5,401 references, 42 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were considered eligible and 21 provided data for inclusion (N 1,234). A score ≤ 2 in the Clinical Global Impressions Improvement and Severity scales were chosen to define response and remission, respectively. A two-stage random-effects meta-analysis model was established. The area under the curve (AUC) and the Youden Index were computed to indicate the discriminative ability of the CY-BOCS and to guide for the optimal cutoff, respectively. Results: The CY-BOCS had sufficient discriminative ability to determine response (AUC 0.89) and remission (AUC 0.92). The optimal cutoff for response was a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline to posttreatment (sensitivity [95% CI] 83.9 [83.7, 84.1]; specificity [95% CI] 81.7 [81.5, 81.9]). The optimal cutoff for remission was a posttreatment raw score ≤ 12 (sensitivity [95% CI] 82.0 [81.8, 82.2]; specificity [95% CI] 84.6 [84.4, 84.8]). Conclusion: Meta-analysis identified empirically optimal cutoffs on the CY-BOCS to determine response and remission in pediatric OCD RCTs. Systematic adoption of standardized operational definitions for response and remission will improve comparability across trials for pediatric OCD
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
DIGITUM Universidad de Murcia (España)
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:digitum.um.es:10201/138138
Last time updated on 15/05/2024