We examine ``tournament'' second-price auctions in which N bidders compete
for the right to participate in a second stage and contend against bidder
N+1. When the first N bidders are committed so that their bids cannot be
changed in the second stage, the analysis yields some unexpected results. The
first N bidders consistently bid above their values in equilibrium. When
bidder N+1 is sufficiently stronger than the first N, overbidding leads to
an increase in expected revenue in comparison to the standard second-price
auction when N is large.Comment: 19 page