Supplementary materials: Continuous vital sign monitoring in patients after elective abdominal surgery: a retrospective study on clinical outcomes and costs

Abstract

These are peer-reviewed supplementary materials for the article 'Continuous vital sign monitoring in patients after elective abdominal surgery: a retrospective study on clinical outcomes and costs' published in the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research.Table S1: Clinical outcomes in different disease categoriesTable S2: Linear regression results for length of stayTable S3: Logistic regression summary results for ICU admissionTable S4: EWS measurementsTable S5: EWS scores of HR and RR measurementsTable S6: Linear regression summary results for ward costsTable S7: Linear regression summary results for ICU costsTable S8: Linear regression summary results for total costsAim: To assess changes in outcomes and costs upon implementation of continuous vital sign monitoring in postsurgical patients. Materials & methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and in-hospital costs compared with a control period. Results: During the intervention period patients were less frequently admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p = 0.004), had shorter length of stay (p Conclusion: Continuous vital sign monitoring may have contributed to fewer ICU admissions and lower ICU costs in postsurgical patients.</p