Evan James Livesey, University of Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Doi
Abstract
[EN]In two experiments with large samples of participants, we explored contextual memory
effects associated with body posture, which was considered a physical and proprioceptive
context and, therefore, potentially relevant to the encoding and retrieval of information. In
Experiment 1 (N = 128), we studied the effect of context dependence on memory by manip ulating the body posture adopted by the participants during the incidental encoding and sub sequent recall of a series of action sentences not intrinsically associated with particular
body postures (e.g., “to put on a pair of glasses”, “to look at a postcard”). Memory perfor mance was not affected by context manipulation, as reflected by the absence of significant
differences between remembering while in the posture adopted at study or in a different pos ture. Experiment 2 (N = 85) was designed to analyze context congruency memory effects,
and for that purpose we manipulated the participants’ body posture during the recall of sen tences that described actions usually performed in body postures that were congruent or
incongruent with the posture of the participants (e.g., recalling the sentence “to travel by
taxi” while sitting or while standing). A content-neutral posture (lying) was used for the inci dental encoding phase. Memory performance was not affected by contextual congruency at
the time of recall, as evidenced by the lack of significant differences between recalling in a
posture congruent with the content to be recalled and recalling in an alternative posture.
Bayesian analyses supported the strength of null findings in the two experiments, adding to
the evidence that, when taken together, the results in this study clearly failed to show con textual memory effects of body posture on the recall of action-related verbal statements