CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Research
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Using a prognostic medical device for early identification of pressure ulcers: protocol for study design
Authors
Emma Belilios
Humayra Dervin
+9 more
Kim Keltie
Lizzy Latimer
Catherine McParlin
Jeanette Milne
Emmanuel Ogundimu
Fania Pagnamenta
Rosalyn Parker
Andrew Sims
James Wason
Publication date
20 June 2024
Publisher
MA Healthcare
Doi
Abstract
Item is not available in this repository.Rosalyn Parker - ORCID: 0000-0002-0873-6878 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-6878Background: An objective, physiological measurement taken using a medical device may reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers through earlier detection of problems signs before visual signs appear. Research in this field is hampered by variations in clinical practice and patient-level confounders. Aim: The authors outline key considerations for designing a protocol for a study to assess the efficacy and safety of a prognostic medical device in reducing pressure ulcer incidence in a hospital, including comparators, randomisation, sample size, ethics and practical issues. Method: Key issues relating to methodology and ethics are considered alongside a theoretical protocol, which could support future researchers in wound care trials. Results: A prospective, three-armed, multi-centre, stratified cluster-randomised controlled trial is proposed. The third arm is recommended as it is expected that patients will need to be moved for the medical device to be used and repositioning is a preventive strategy. A minimum of 16200 patients in 33 wards would needed to be recruited to achieve statistical significance. Ethical considerations in terms of consent or assent need to be considered. Conclusion: The hypothetical study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a diagnostic or prognostic medical device in reducing pressure ulcer incidence in secondary care, while accounting for biases, would require large sample sizes and involves risks of inter-operator and inter-device reliability, heterogeneity of users and the vague clinical interpretation of device results. Robust research in this field has the potential to influence or change policy and practice relating to the prevention of pressure ulcers in secondary care. © 2024 MA Healthcare Ltd.https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.015833pubpub1
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Queen Margaret University eResearch
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:20.500...
Last time updated on 05/07/2024