The edges of galaxies in the Fornax Cluster: Fifty percent smaller and denser compared to the field

Abstract

Physically motivated measurements are crucial for understanding galaxy growth and the role of the environment on their evolution. In particular, the growth of galaxies as measured by their size or radial extent provides an empirical approach for addressing this issue. However, the established definitions of galaxy size used for nearly a century are ill-suited for these studies because of a previously ignored bias. The conventionally-measured radii consistently miss the diffuse, outer extensions of stellar emission which harbour key signatures of galaxy growth, including star formation and gas accretion or removal. This issue is addressed by examining low surface brightness truncations or galaxy "edges" as a physically motivated tracer of size based on star formation thresholds. Our total sample consists of $\sim900$ galaxies with stellar masses ranging from $10^5 M_{\odot} < M_{\star} < 10^{11} M_{\odot}$. This sample of nearby cluster, group satellite and nearly isolated field galaxies was compiled using multi-band imaging from the Fornax Deep Survey, deep IAC Stripe 82 and Dark Energy Camera Legacy Surveys. Across the full mass range studied, we find that compared to the field, the edges of galaxies in the Fornax Cluster are located at 50% smaller radii and the average stellar surface density at the edges are two times higher. These results are consistent with the rapid removal of loosely bound neutral hydrogen (HI) in hot, crowded environments which truncates galaxies outside-in earlier, preventing the formation of more extended sizes and lower density edges. In fact, we find that galaxies with lower HI fractions have edges with higher stellar surface density. Our results highlight the importance of deep imaging surveys to study the low surface brightness imprints of the large scale structure and environment on galaxy evolution.Comment: 22 pages, 12 figures, 2 tables, submitted to A&A after LSST DESC internal and collaboration wide review (see acknowledgements). Example galaxies in Figs. 2, 5 and 6. Key results in Figs. 7, 8, 11 and 1