A scalable fire danger index based on sentinel imagery

Abstract

The incidence of wildfires and megafires and their disastrous consequences is increasing all over the planet. According to the latest European Forest Fire Information System annual fire report, in 2021 alone wildfires burned a surface area more than twice the size of Luxembourg, including more than a thousand square kilometres of Natura 2000 protected areas. In addition, 2022 has registered the highest number of wildfires since 2006, and will also be recorded as one of the driest years on record. Assuming that the most efficient and cost-effective way limit the damage caused by wildfires consists in their prevention, building tools to allow the decision makers to allocate resources using state of the art technology and fresh data is of the utmost importance. To this end, the combined usage of data from weather and satellite platforms capable to provide data on a regional or national scale and at a high temporal frequency provides the optimal solution for assessing and monitoring the state of the vegetation. However, users of fire danger product users often complain about the resolution of the provided products. While moderate- or coarse-resolution products may be adequate to cover the regional or national scale, high-resolution products are required to properly describe the fire danger in relatively small-sized areas of high interest in fire danger modelling, such as wildland-urban interfaces, national parks or protected areas. Using a different fire danger product based on the spatial scale of the target may be impractical and increase the workload and training requirements for the personnel. For this reason, we propose a scalable fire danger index based on Sentinel imagery that is able to cover different spatial scales by exploiting the surface reflectances provided by different Sentinel products (i.e. Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3). This novel index, named Daily Fire Danger Index, exploits both weather and satellite data to estimate all the main variables of fire danger, such as the amount of dead fuel, moisture of the dead and live fuels, wind speed, evapotranspiration etc, and is calibrated using the historical records of wildfire occurrence in the target region. In particular, the live fuel moisture content is estimated using a state of the art procedure based on the inversion of radiative transfer models of the PROSAIL family. The index was tested in Sardinia, a region well-known for its proneness to wildfires and which is also regularly affected by megafires, and the performance comparison with the Canadian Fire Weather Index shows very significant improvements on the capability to discriminate fire danger even at a moderate resolution. Finally, the 2021 Planargia-Montiferru megafire was selected as a case study to showcase the added value of the high-resolution version of the index

    Similar works