The present article examines epistemological markers in socio-political forums on Iranian TV channels from the critical discourse analysis point of view based on Hyland (2005) and Fairclough (2001). In this study, 20 selected socio-political panels of 1,2, 3 & 4 channels have been selected, which are samples have been analyzed in qualitatively and quantitatively way in the form of all of them using targeted sampling. The variables studied in this study to be determined by this factors, the gender of the experts, using the live or recorded programs, the number of experts in each program, whether the experts are academic or non-academic. The distribution of epistemological elements in live and recorded programs and the presence of male and female critics and the presence of academic and non-academic factors is different? Also the distribution of elements in the recorded political and social panels is different with the presence of one or more critics? How the differences between the distributions of elements justified are based on Fairclough discourse analysis model? The results showed that the distribution of hedges, boosters, Attitude markers in the programs of socio-political panels in the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting based on the gender of experts, alive or recorded programs, academic or non-academic experts or the presence of one or more experts in each programs are different. Also, based on discourse analysis patterns, can be justified type of using of epistemological tools in the discourse of experts
