We consider a game where N players bet on the outcome of a biased coin and
share the entry fees pot if successful. We assume that one player holds
information about past outcomes of the game, which they may either use
exclusively to improve their betting strategy or offer to sell to another
player. We determine analytically the optimal price curves for the data seller
and the prospective buyer. We find a sharp transition in the number N of
players that separates a phase where the transaction is always profitable for
the seller from one where it may not be. In both phases, different regimes are
possible, depending on the "quality" of information being put up for sale: we
observe symbiotic regimes, where both parties collude effectively to rig the
game in their favor, competitive regimes, where the transaction is unappealing
to the data holder as it overly favors a competitor for scarce resources, and
even prey-predator regimes, where the data holder is eager to give away
bad-quality data to undercut a competitor. Our framework can be generalized to
more complex settings and constitutes a flexible tool to address the rich and
timely problem of pricing information in games of chance.Comment: 18 pages, 6 figure