CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Apparatus development for detecting the freshness of chicken meat using TCS 3200, PH-98108, and MOS gas sensors
Authors
N. Bintoro
J. N. W. Karyadi
+3 more
P. W. Nastiti
S. Rahayoe
A. D. Saputro
Publication date
1 January 2023
Publisher
'Rynnye Lyan Resources'
Abstract
Meat can be determined as a muscle that has entered a rigour mortis state. Due to its high nutritional content, the quality of chicken meat quickly decreased. The changes in meat colour, pH, and metabolite gas production, especially ammonia and hydrogen sulfide, are the typical indicators for meat degradation. This research aimed to design and build an apparatus to evaluate the freshness of the chicken meat displayed for sale or storage. In the following study, four different sensors, including TCS 3200 colour sensor, Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) gas sensors (MQ 136, MQ 137), and PH-98108 sensors, were assembled with the aid of a microcontroller and personal computer to become a meat freshness detection apparatus. After being calibrated, the apparatus was then used to evaluate the freshness of the chicken meat sample. The results indicated that the apparatus showed satisfactory performance in detecting the freshness of the chicken meat sample. This apparatus was movable, simple, cheap, easy to operate, and suitable to be used by meat sellers or related institutions. The sensors used were capable of detecting the changes in colour, pH, NH3 gas, and H2S of the sample. The parameters of L*, b*, pH, H2S, and NH3 gas effectively detected the freshness of chicken meat. After 12 hrs of storage, the values of L*, b*, pH, H2S, and NH3 gas of the sample were 50.34, 17.26, 6.59, 134.08 ppm, and 42.34 ppm, respectively. © 2023 The Authors. Published by Rynnye Lyan Resources
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
repository civitas UGM
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:generic.eprints.org:281797...
Last time updated on 03/12/2023