CORE
CO
nnecting
RE
positories
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Research partnership
About
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Community governance
Governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
Innovations
Our research
Labs
Search results
>
Research work
The use of random forests to classify amyloid brain PET
Authors
Sabrina Adamo
Sandra E. Black
+19 more
Christian Bocti
Michael Borrie
Howard Chertkow
Richard Frayne
Vincent C. Gaudet
Maged Goubran
Robin Hsiung
Phillip H. Kuo
Robert Laforce
Michael D. Noseworthy
Frank S. Prato
Demetrios J. Sahlas
Christopher Scott
Eric E. Smith
Vesna Sossi
Jean-Paul Soucy
Jean-Claude Tardif
Alexander Thiel
Katherine Zukotynski
Publication date
1 October 2019
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
Doi
Abstract
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.Purpose: To evaluate random forests (RFs) as a supervised machine learning algorithm to classify amyloid brain PET as positive or negative for amyloid deposition and identify key regions of interest for stratification. Methods: The data set included 57 baseline 18F-florbetapir (Amyvid; Lilly, Indianapolis, IN) brain PET scans in participants with severe white matter disease, presenting with either transient ischemic attack/lacunar stroke or mild cognitive impairment from early Alzheimer disease, enrolled in a multicenter prospective observational trial. Scans were processed using the MINC toolkit to generate SUV ratios, normalized to cerebellar gray matter, and clinically read by 2 nuclear medicine physicians with interpretation based on consensus (35 negative, 22 positive). SUV ratio data and clinical reads were used for super- vised training of an RF classifier programmed in MATLAB. Results: A 10,000-tree RF, each tree using 15 randomly selected cases and 20 randomly selected features (SUV ratio per region of interest), with 37 cases for training and 20 cases for testing, had sensitivity = 86% (95% confidence in- terval [CI], 42%–100%), specificity = 92% (CI, 64%–100%), and classification accuracy = 90% (CI, 68%–99%). The most common features at the root node (key regions for stratification) were (1) left posterior cingulate (1039 trees), (2) left middle frontal gyrus (1038 trees), (3) left precuneus (857 trees), (4) right an- terior cingulate gyrus (655 trees), and (5) right posterior cingulate (588 trees). Conclusions: Random forests can classify brain PET as positive or negative for amyloid deposition and suggest key clinically relevant, regional features for classification.CIHR MITNEC C6 || Linda C Campbell Foundation || Lilly-Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
Similar works
Full text
Open in the Core reader
Download PDF
Available Versions
University of Waterloo's Institutional Repository
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:uwspace.uwaterloo.ca:10012...
Last time updated on 27/11/2023