Objectives: Evaluate the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions and digital interventions aimed at improving the sexual health of stroke survivors documented in the literature.
Method: The databases searched were MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, EBSCO (APA PsycINFO and APA PsycArticles), and Cochrane. Following PRISMA guidelines, data were collected by a single author, with the consultation of co-authors when clarifications were needed. Only original publications in English were included. The risk of bias was assessed using tools such as ROBINS-I, Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool, and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist.
Results: From an initial total of 1053 publications identified, 5 studies were included. The study designs included randomized clinical studies, a quasi-experimental study, a cross-sectional study, and a case study. No studies were identified on the efficacy of digital interventions. The predominant intervention model used in most of the studies was the PLISSIT model, with or without psycho-educational supplements.
Conclusions: Although available literature points to the benefits of psychotherapeutic interventions in promoting the sexual health of stroke survivors, the data showed differences in the degree of this efficacy, even among those based on the PLISSIT model. This research underscores the potential benefits of tailored interventions for post-stroke sexual rehabilitation and highlights areas for future research
