Quantitative evaluation of simultaneous spatial and temporal regularization in liver perfusion studies using low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced CT

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the performance of different simultaneous spatial and temporal regularizers in liver perfusion studies using low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT). A digital liver phantom was used to simulate chronic liver disease (CLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on clinical data. Low-dose DCE-CT images were reconstructed using regularizers and a primal-dual algorithm. Subsequently, hepatic perfusion parameter (HPP) images were generated using a dual-input single-compartment model and linear least-squares method. In the CLD model, the effect of regularizers on the input functions (IFs) was examined by calculating the areas under the curves (AUCs) of the IFs, and the HPP estimation accuracy was evaluated by calculating the error and coefficient of variation (CV) between the HPP values obtained by the above methods and true values. In the HCC model, the ratios of the mean HPP values inside and outside the tumor were calculated. The AUCs of IFs decreased with increasing regularization parameter (RP) values. Although the AUC of arterial IF did not significantly depend on the regularizers, that of portal IF did. The error and CV were reduced using low-rank and sparse decomposition (LRSD). Total generalized variation (TGV) combined with LRSD (LTGV) was generally superior to the other regularizers in terms of HPP estimation accuracy and range of available RP values in both the CLD and HCC models. However, striped artifacts were more remarkable in the HPP images obtained by the TGV and LTGV than in those obtained by the other regularizers. The results suggest that the LRSD and LTGV are useful for improving the accuracy of HPP estimation using low-dose DCE-CT and for enhancing its practicality. This study will help select a suitable regularizer and/or RP value for low-dose DCE-CT liver perfusion studies.Comment: 32 pages, 1 table, 10 figure