Using the `quantum optical approach' we propose a model of multiplicity
distributions in high energy collisions based on squeezed coherent states.
  We show that the k-mode squeezed coherent state is the most general one in
describing hadronic mulitiplicity distributions in particle collision
processes, describing not only $p \bar p$ collisions but $e^{+}e^{-}$, $\nu p$
and diffractive collisions as well.
  The reason for this phenomenological fit has been gained by working out a
microscopic theory in which the squeezed coherent sources arise naturally if
one considers the Lorentz squeezing of hadrons and works in the covariant phase
space formalism .Comment: 7 pages, 4 Figures (can be obtained from author by snail mail

Bambah, Bindu A.

English

arXiv

Using the 'quantum optical approach' we propose a model of multiplicity distributions in high energy collisions based on squeezed coherent states. We show that the k-mode squeezed coherent state is the most general one in describing hadronic multiplicity distributions in particle collision processes, describing not only p(bar-p) collisions but e(+)e(-), vp and diffractive collisions as well. The reason for this phenomenological fit has been gained by working out a microscopic theory in which the squeezed coherent sources arise naturally if one considers the Lorentz squeezing of hadrons and works in the covariant phase space formalism

NASA Technical Reports Server

_ -)/
SQUEEZED STATES AND PARTICLE PRODUCTION
IN HIGH ENERGY COLLISIONS
Bindu A. Bambah
School of Physics
Univ. Of Hyderabad Hyderabad-500134,India
Abstract
Using the 'quantum optical approach' we propose a model of multiplicity distributions in
high energy collisions based on squeezed coherent states. We show that the k-mode squeezed
coherent state is the most general one in describing hadronic mulitiplicity distributions in
particle collision processes, describing not only pp collisions but e+e -, vp and diffractive
collisions as well. The reason for this phenomenological fit has been gained by working out
a microscopic theory in which the squeezed coherent sources arise naturally if one considers
the Lorentz squeezing of hadrons and works in the covariant phase space formalism.
1 INTRODUCTION
Although Quantum Chromodynamics is widely believed to be the theory of Strong Interactions,
very few experimental results support this claim. In particular the behaviour of QCD at small
momentum transfer i.e low energies is not understood. This lack of understanding reflects itself in
the fact that particle production in high energy collisions cannot be explained within QCD. Given
the absence of a detailed dynamical theory of strong interactions , one can adopt a statistical
outlook and try to forecast macroscopic behaviour of a strongly interacting system given only
partial information about their internal states.Experimental information about hadronisation in
high energy collisions comes from the observation of jets of hadrons and the distributions of the
final state particles. By using analogies with quantum optical systems one can get information
about the types of sources( Chaotic, coherent, etc) that are responsible for hadronic emission.
Also, by using adapting another quantum optical effect such as the Hanbury-Brown Twiss effect
one can study the size and lifetime of the emitting region. This information can then be used to
put restrictions on the microscopic theory pursued from the quark-paxton end [1].
The experimental quantities amenable to the quantum statistical approach are: the multiplicity
Distribution of final state particles (PIONS)given by
p,_ a,, (1)
G inel
where a,, n-pion cross-section, the number of particles produced per unit rapidity dN/dy , where
y = ln(_+_-_pL) is the rapidity which plays the role of time in pion counting experiments, the
moments of P,_ and the two pion correlations which are analogous to Hanbury Brown Twiss effect
for pions in rapidity space.
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19960024990 2020-06-16T04:54:41+00:00Z
In particular, the quantum optical models are based on the assumption that multiparticle
production takes place in two stages. In the initial stage formation of an excited system (fireball)
which consists of a number of well defined phase space cells or 'sources' which then hadronize
independently. In these models an ansatz is made about the statistical nature of these sources
and the resulting multiplicity distributions are compared with data [2], [3]. Table 1. gives the
comparison of various quantum optical models.
Table 1: Comparison of Quantum Optical Models of Multiplicity Distributions
Nature Of Source
One Source
P(a) = J-_exp (-I°l'/'a)
P(a) = 5a(a - a')
K sources
Gaussian (Chaotic)
Coherent +Chaotic
Density matrix
(Coherent State Rep)
p,"` = _ -"`
p,_. ]_'12"_-I_'t_
= r(,+l)
pnn -- _e -la'12/(l+g)
x L,_(_ -_'° )
n-l-k--1)lf _/k '_n 1
P,,,, - ,,tik+l)t _ l+_/kJ
(p_/k)"
P'_'_ ---- (l+_/k)-+_
Probability Two pion
Distribution Correlations
Geometrical g2 (0) = 2
Poissonian g2(0) = 1
Glauber-Lachs 1 _< g2(0) _< 2.
Negative Binomial ""
Perina-McGill
2 The Phenomenological model
Experimentally there exists a large class of data (up) and low mass diffractive data that have
mulplicity distributions with sub-Poissonian Statistics. Thus we seek a more general distribution
than the ones given in table 1. A clue as to the appropriate distribution is that charged pions
occur in pairs Furthermore the most general Gaussian source characterised by Gaussian Wigner
Function. These facts point to the use of Squeezed Coherent states.
We find that the k-mode squeezed state la, r >-- lal,rl > la2, r2 > ... lak,rk >
characterised by the multiplicity distribution:
p k = e[-k_2(l+x)](1 _ x2)k/2(__x),
x __, m[(n- 2m)!
v!_,=0
Y: _ 2x
3,= _.__!; 3'., = (3' + 1)...(3' + (m- 1)) ; 3'0 = 1
and the secondorder correlation function:
g_(O) = 1 + 2sinh4(r) + (2a2 + 1)sinh2(r)- sinh(2r)
k( a2 + sinh2(r)) 2 (3)
is the most general distribution that fits a wide range of data [4]. If r > 0 there are regions where
g_(0) < 1 and the distribution is narrower than Poissonian. If r < 0; g_(0) is always greater then
1 showing distributions which are broader than Poissonian.
Hadronic distributions in p_ collisions show broader than Poisonnian multiplicity distributions
with a long multiplicity tail, which gets broader and broader with the increase of energy. The
k = 3 mode distribution for _ = 13.6, x = -0.20 and _ = 26.1, x = -0.35 respectively fit
corresponding ISR (62.2Gev) and UA5 (540Gev) data, a for each of these is thus fixed.
To fit neutrino induced collisions in which the distribution is super-Poissonian ((-_) < 1), k =
3, x = 0.5 fit data well. e+e - collisions are fit by the k=2 squeezed coherent distribution with r
close to zero. (nearly Poissonian.)
3 The Statistics confronts the Dynamics
We would now like to conjecture on the reason for this success and find an overlap with dyamical
models. We search for incoming states of the hadronic fireball which will give rise to SQUEEZED
COttERENT DISTRIBUTION. The candidate dynamical model of hadrons, which we find is
appropriate is the covariant phase space model for hadrons which is a revival of Feynman et. al's
relativistic harmonic oscillator model[5] Kim and Wigner pointed out that the covariant harmonic
oscillator model is the natural language for a covariant description of phase-space [6], [7]. In this
paper, we use the covariant phase space distribution description of relativistic extended particles
to give a phenomenological description of multiplicity distributions in the high energy collisions
of hadrons
Wave functions without time-like oscillations can be constructed by using the unitary repre-
sentations of the Poincare group and imposing a covariant condition[8]. In this model two quarks
bound together by a relativistic harmonic oscillator potential mapped onto O(3,1) invariant har-
monic oscillator equation. The ground state wave function ¢_ in the Lorentz boosted (primed)
frame is
Cg(x') = [e-'_K3l¢0(x) (4)
where I(3 boost generator along the z axis,
• (9 0
_(3= _(z_ + t_) (5)
and 71= Tanh- 1(/3)
In 'Quantum Optical' language, using light- cone variables we have:
_,= (t + =)/_ v = (t- z)/v_ (_:",
Then in the Lorcntz-transformed frame:
! /
q_ = c_q,, q_ -- e-,Iq_
It¢ = e-_V_t V I = C_V (r)
Introducing creation and annihilation operators
0 0
a, = u + 0---u.... a_ = v + 0-_
0 0
4 = u - o_ ......4 = v- oG
we find that the wave function ¢_ = ¢(u', v') is a two mode squeezed state.
¢o_(_,',v') = Io,Z >= Io,, >,,, Io,-, >¢ (8)
The excited state is given by:
In,Z >= (d.,)"lo,, > (G)"lo,-,7 > (9)
The condition for absence of time-like oscillations in the hadronic rest-frame
(a'_ - a_,,)ln, fl >= 0. (10)
The physical wave functions are
¢_(u"v')=]n'fl>= _-_( n ) In-m'_?>_'lm'-_?>'/,,,=om (11)
in the Fock-space representation
nl 9n2 to.=O
(12)
Where [9]:
m!n! , ,tanh(rl) ,.,+.
a.,._ = (-1)_-{2-2" (co-_))_ , _ )
""'q_ _1 --4 A(_)
× _ (2_)!(m/2- _)!(n/2- _)!
A
(13)
for n,In even and
, .,_---_-3/2, re!n! tanh(_l)
c,,,,. : t-.L) _ " _o-2_-,))( 2 )_-'-_"-'
-,i-I_ -!,_:-_l -4 _,
(_) (14)
× _ (2A + 1)!(m- 1/2- A)!(n- 1/2- A)!
A
for n,m odd. C,,.,_ is non zero for both n,m even or both n,m odd , thus excitations of quarks
occur in pairs, and the Lorentz squeezed vacuum is a many particle state. The above suggests
6
the identification of tIadronic sourcesin terms of squeezedstates.
In the 'fireball picture ' the Wigner function of the sourceis , [10]
W_(u,v,q_,,q,,) = (2)2e-½(e""2+_-"qa+_-'_2+e'q_)
7r
x (- 1)"L,__,_[e% 2 - e -nq_] L,_[e-'Tv 2 - e 'Tq_]
m=O m
The number distribution for 1 particles in the n th excited state.
pi = _ _(nm ) p'_-'_'sq(r/)Pi'_'sq(-r#)"11
11+12=1 rn=O
(15)
(16)
p m,,sq =
12 (m)!/2[ (tanh(2-rl) ).__z 2
- l_)Tr
× F(-rl'12'm)c°s2((m 2 ) (17)
where:
_i,-,(l_/2,(,_-l_)/2 ( -4 ,,, (18)
A=0
The cosine terms imply Pl vanishes when Im- 12] or In - m - Ix l is odd. so that the excited each
of oscillator modes is excited in pairs.
If each pair is associated with a two quark bound state(pion), the excited state con-
tains pair correlated pions!!!
4 Results and Conclusion
The picture emerging is as follows the distribution of the fireball results from the excitation of
oscillator modes of the colliding hadrons. This excitation takes place in pairs. Modes de-excite
statistically emitting 2 pairs of quarks which we identify as two pions The phase space distribution
of the fireball:
[ < n,131n,__3, > [2 = (2_r) S dudvW_(u,v,q_,q_)W_,(u,v,q_,q_) (19)
Probability of emission of m particles from two independent populations 1 and 2 corresponding
to each of the incident hadrons, forming an overlapping distributions is given as:
rf_
P,*= E pl_,,,p_, (20)
rtit =0
Total probability distribution thus becomes a product of the probability distribution of four
squeezed sources:
P._ = _ PA1( rl )P,_q=( - r])P,_ _(r/ ) P,_, ( - r/ )
rni +--m2 +rn3 +m4=rn
For target Projectile collisions fl_ = 0 thus the probability of emitting n' particles is:
Pn I
X
p m
p=0 m=0
1
(- 1)_ (p!(n - m)!m!(n' - p)!)l/2cosh(_ ) (
-4 _+#
_J
x _ (2_)!(p/2 - _1!('_-_ - _)!(m/2 - _1!(-_ _1!
tanh(_) ) (- 1)2
As/3 increases the distribution gets broader .
For Central Collisions/3 =/3' and by plotting mP,_ vs._> for different values of/3 we see that
the distributions become wider and skew symmetric as the value of/:3 becomes larger. This is
consistent with the variation seen in experimental data.
The total probability distribution for the two nucleon system for n pions is:
k/2 k/2
P_= _ liP2(_) _ YIP:, q(-_) (21)
where k=6 for nucleon-nucleon collisions , k=4 for r_" collisions and k=3 for vp collisions (with
positive).
We include final state interactions in a simple fashion by assuming that the effect of interaction
is to add coherence into the final state. This is consistent with the fact that in particle collisions
experimental data shows some amount of coherence, especially in the low energy region , among
the emitted particles. With the resulting density matrix we obtain the mutiplicity distribution for
a variety of collisions and compare to data. The distribution we get is:
k/2 k12
= p sq,coherent /p_q,_o_re.,C_) E H., _,-_) (22)Eli-., ,
Where the average number of particles emitted by each mode is given by:_ = a 2 + Sinh2(_)
Above distribution fits the CERN ISR 62.2 GeV and UA5 540 GeV data. The k=3 distribution is
compared with up data. The data is well reproduced by the distribution. For e+e - collisions we
take k=2 because the intermedeate state is the virtual _q state formed by the colliding electron
and positron.
In terms of hadronic final states the LEP energy (x/_ = 100 GeV) is equivalent to the SPS
energy (v/s = 546 GeV ) as far as total mutiplicities are concerned, in so far as _-*+¢-(LEP)
_P(SPS) _26 .
For the same value of_ much narrower distribution for e+e - distributions than the _p distributions.
This is consistent with recent LEP data [11].
We can make some predictions for higher energies such as those observed at the LHC and
SSC. Since widening of the distributions is related to the squeezing parameter r} the lorentz boost
of the hadronic fireball, at C.M.S. energies of 20 TeV and above we have a large/3 value and
higher modeswill be excited. The multiplicity distribution for ultra-high energiesis very broad
and skew-symmetric,plot _P,,vs.-_for _p collisionsfor _ = 50
We can also calculatethe Bose-EinsteinCorrelationsof pions in this model by usingthe two
mode state. Ongoing work is in progressto establish the connectionof this model with QCD
using the light coneformalism [12]. In this formalism it is alsoeasyto incorporate temperature
dependenceby usingThermal SqueezedCoherentstates.Thesewould be of interest in heavyion
collisions.
5 Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Prof. Y.S. Kim and all the other organizers of ICSSUR '95 for their kind hos-
pitality and support. I also acknowledge the support of the University Grants Commision,National
Board of Higher Mathematics, INSA , DST and CSIR for their support.
References
[1] P.Carruthers and C.C.Shih, International Journal of Mod. Phys.A2(1987)1447.
[2] G.N. Fowler and R.M. Weiner in 'Hadronic Multipaticle Production' Ed. P.Carruthers,
(1988) 481.
[3] T.C. Meng in Hadronic Multiparticle Production Ed. P. Carruthers (1988), and refer-
ences therein.
[4] B.Bambah and M.V.Satyanarayana Phys. Rev. D 38(1988) 2202.
[5] R.P.Feynman,M.Kislinger and F.Ravndal Phys. Rev. D 3(1971)2706.
[6] Y.S.Kim and E.P.Wigner, Phys. Rev. A 39(1989)2829.
[7] Y.S.Zim and E.P.Wigner, Phys. Rev. D 49(1990).
[8] Y.S. Kim and M.E.Noz.'Theory and Applications of the Poincare Group' (Reidel and
Dortrecht, 1986).
[9] M.V.Satyanarayana Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 400.
[10[ S. Chaturvedi and V. Srinivasan Phys. Rev. A 40 (1989)6095.
; M.S.Kim, F.A.M. de Oliviera and P.L.Knight"The Squeezing of Pock and Thermal
States" Impcrial College Preprint,1991
[11] D. Decamp et. al. ALEPH COLLAB. , Phys. Lett. B273 (1991)180.
[12] S.J.Brodsky in Nuclear Chromodynamics S.J. Brodsky and E.J. Moniz .eds. (World Sci-
entific, 1986) and F.Lenz. ibid.



Squeezed States and Particle Production in High Energy Collisions

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

NASA Technical Reports Server