We show that strategy-proof allocation mechanisms for economies with public goods are
dictatorial -- i.e., they always select an allocation in their range that maximizes the welfare of the
same single individual (the dictator). Further, strategy-proof and efficient allocation mechanisms
are strongly dictatorial -- i.e., they select the dictator's preferred allocation on the entire feasible
set. Thus, our results reveal the extent to which the conflict between individual incentives and
other properties that may be deemed desirable (e.g., fairness, equal treatment, distributive justice)
pervades resource allocation problems