Consider a non-spanned security CT in an incomplete market. We
study the risk/return tradeoffs generated if this security is sold
for an arbitrage-free price C0^ and then hedged. We
consider recursive "one-period optimal" self-financing hedging
strategies, a simple but tractable criterion. For continuous
trading, diffusion processes, the one-period minimum variance
portfolio is optimal. Let C0(0) be its price. Self-financing
implies that the residual risk is equal to the sum of the one-period
orthogonal hedging errors, ∑t≤TYt(0)er(T−t). To
compensate the residual risk, a risk premium ytΔt is
associated with every Yt. Now let C0(y) be the price of
the hedging portfolio, and ∑t≤T(Yt(y)+ytΔt)er(T−t) is the total residual risk. Although not the same, the
one-period hedging errors Yt(0)andYt(y) are orthogonal to
the trading assets, and are perfectly correlated. This implies that
the spanned option payoff does not depend on y. Let
C0^−C0(y). A main result follows. Any arbitrage-free
price, C0^, is just the price of a hedging portfolio (such
as in a complete market), C0(0), plus a premium,
C0^−C0(0). That is, C0(0) is the price of the
option's payoff which can be spanned, and C0^−C0(0) is
the premium associated with the option's payoff which cannot be
spanned (and yields a contingent risk premium of sum ytΔter(T−t) at maturity). We study other applications of option-pricing theory as well