CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Brief report comparing the Scale of Emotional Development - Short (SED-S) with other scales for emotional development
Authors
B F Barrett
M Flachsmeyer
+4 more
Marie Ilic
F Morisse
Tanja Sappok
S Vandevelde
Publication date
1 January 2023
Publisher
Wiley
Doi
Cite
Abstract
Sappok T, Morisse F, Flachsmeyer M, Vandevelde S, Ilic M, Barrett BF. Brief report comparing the Scale of Emotional Development - Short (SED-S) with other scales for emotional development. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2023.BACKGROUND: Different instruments were devised for assessing emotional development (ED) level in persons with an intellectual disability (ID), that is, the Scale of Emotional Development - Short (SED-S), the Scheme for Appraisal of Emotional Development (SAED), the Scale for Emotional Development - Second Revision (SED-R2 ) and the Schaal voor Emotionele Ontwikkeling - Lukas (SEO-Lukas). The aim of this study was to compare the level of emotional functioning as assessed with the SED-S with the SAED, SED-R2 and SEO-Lukas.; METHODS: Emotional development was measured in adults with ID with the SED-S (N=186) and the SAED (n=85), the SED-R2 (n=50) and the SEO-Lukas (n=51). Correlation analysis and Cohen's kappas were calculated between the SED-S and the three respective scales. Internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha) of the four scales were determined.; RESULTS: The SED-S results correlated most with the SEO-Lukas (gamma=1; кomega=0.936) followed by the SAED (gamma=0.809; кomega=0.343) and least by the SED-R2 (gamma=0.665; кomega=0.182). The stage of ED assessed with the SED-S was lower than the ED results measured with the SAED, but higher than with the SED-R2 and most similar to the SEO-Lukas. Cronbach's alphas were high, ranging from 0.853 to 0.975.; CONCLUSIONS: Given the respective differences between the scales, the SED-S may equalise the results as compared with previous versions. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Ghent University Academic Bibliography
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:archive.ugent.be:01HCM4MPB...
Last time updated on 12/11/2023
Publications at Bielefeld University
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:pub.uni-bielefeld.de:29829...
Last time updated on 24/09/2023