In this paper, four different cavitation models were compared for predicting cavitation around a hydrofoil. A blocked structured mesh was created in ICEM CFD. Steady-state 2D simulations were performed in Ansys CFX. For all cases, the SST turbulence model with Reboud\u27s correction was used. For Zwart and Schnerr cavitation models, the recommended values were used for the empirical coefficients. For the full cavitation model and Kunz cavitation model, values for the empirical coefficients were determined as the recommended values did not provide satisfactory results. For the full cavitation model, the effect of non-condensable gases was neglected. For all the above-mentioned cavitation models, the pressure coefficient distribution was compared to experimental results from the literature.V prispevku je narejena primerjava med štirimi kavitacijskimi modeli pri numerični napovedi kavitacije na hidrodinamičnem profilu. V ICEM CFD je bila izdelana blokovna strukturirana mreža. V Ansys CFX so se izvedle 2D stacionarne simulacije. Za vse simulacije je bil uporabljen SST turbulentni model s korekcijo, ki jo je uvedel Reboud. Za kavitacijska modela Zwart in Schnerr smo uporabili privzete vrednosti empirični koeficientov. Za full cavitation model in Kunzov kavitacijski model smo vrednosti koeficientov določili sami, saj privzete vrednosti niso dale zadovoljivih rezultatov. Za vse štiri zgoraj omenjene kavitacijske modele smo primerjali porazdelitev tlačnega koeficienta z eksperimentalnimi rezultati iz literature
