Cyclists’ safety is crucial for a sustainable transport system. Cyclists are considered vulnerableroad users because they are not protected by a physical compartment around them. In recentyears, passenger car occupants’ share of fatalities has been decreasing, but that of cyclists hasactually increased. Most of the conflicts between cyclists and motorized vehicles occur atcrossings where they cross each other’s path. Automated vehicles (AVs) are being developedto increase traffic safety and reduce human errors in driving tasks, including when theyencounter cyclists at intersections. AVs use behavioral models to predict other road user’sbehaviors and then plan their path accordingly. Thus, there is a need to investigate how cyclistsinteract and communicate with motorized vehicles at conflicting scenarios like unsignalizedintersections. This understanding will be used to develop accurate computational models ofcyclists’ behavior when they interact with motorized vehicles in conflict scenarios.The overall goal of this thesis is to investigate how cyclists communicate and interact withmotorized vehicles in the specific conflict scenario of an unsignalized intersection. In the firstof two studies, naturalistic data was used to model the cyclists’ decision whether to yield to apassenger car at an unsignalized intersection. Interaction events were extracted from thetrajectory dataset, and cyclists’ behavioral cues were added from the sensory data. Bothcyclists’ kinematics and visual cues were found to be significant in predicting who crossed theintersection first. The second study used a cycling simulator to acquire in-depth knowledgeabout cyclists’ behavioral patterns as they interacted with an approaching vehicle at theunsignalized intersection. Two independent variables were manipulated across the trials:difference in time to arrival at the intersection (DTA) and visibility condition (field of viewdistance). Results from the mixed effect logistic model showed that only DTA affected thecyclist’s decision to cross before the vehicle. However, increasing the visibility at theintersection reduced the severity of the cyclists’ braking profiles. Both studies contributed tothe development of computational models of cyclist behavior that may be used to support safeautomated driving.Future work aims to find differences in cyclists’ interactions with different vehicle types, suchas passenger cars, taxis, and trucks. In addition, the interaction process may also be evaluatedfrom the driver’s perspective by using a driving simulator instead of a riding simulator. Thissetup would allow us to investigate how drivers respond to cyclists at the same intersection.The resulting data will contribute to the development of accurate predictive models for AVs
