CORE
🇺🇦
make metadata, not war
Services
Services overview
Explore all CORE services
Access to raw data
API
Dataset
FastSync
Content discovery
Recommender
Discovery
OAI identifiers
OAI Resolver
Managing content
Dashboard
Bespoke contracts
Consultancy services
Support us
Support us
Membership
Sponsorship
Community governance
Advisory Board
Board of supporters
Research network
About
About us
Our mission
Team
Blog
FAQs
Contact us
Subspecialty training in Europe: A report by the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists
Authors
M. Lanner Nikolova, T. Gutic, B. Nikolova, N. Pletnev, A. Selcuk, I. Vlachos, D.-E. Razumova, Z. Bizzarri, N. Theofanakis, C. Lepka, P. Kahramanoglu, I. Han, S. Nasser, S. Molnar, S. Hudry, D. Montero-Macías, R. De Lange, N. MacUks, R. Hasanov, M.F. Karimbayli, R. Gagua, I. Andrade, C. Pardal, C. Dotlic, J. Alvarez, R.M. Hruda, M. Fruhauf, F. Ekdahl, L. Antonsen, S.L. Sukhin, V. Eriksson, A.G.Z. Gliozheni, E. Delic, R. Satanova, A. Kovacevic, N. Gristsenko, L. Babloyan, S. Zalewski, K. Bharathan, R.
Publication date
1 January 2021
Publisher
Abstract
Background ESGO (European Society of Gynaecological Oncology) and partners are continually improving the developmental opportunities for gynaecological oncology fellows. The objectives of this survey were to evaluate the progress in the infrastructure of the training systems in Europe over the past decade. We also evaluated training and assessment techniques, the perceived relevance of ENYGO (European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists) initiatives, and unmet needs of trainees. Methodology National representatives of ENYGO from 39 countries were contacted with an electronic survey. A graduation in well/moderately/loosely-structured training systems was performed. Descriptive statistical analysis and frequency tables, as well as two-sided Fisher's exact test, were used. Results National representatives from 33 countries answered our survey questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 85%. A national fellowship is offered in 22 countries (66.7%). A logbook to document progress during training is mandatory in 24 (72.7%) countries. A logbook of experience is only utilized in a minority of nations (18%) for assessment purposes. In 42.4% of countries, objective assessments are recognized. Trainees in most countries (22 (66.7%)) requested additional training in advanced laparoscopic surgery. 13 (39.4%) countries have a loosely-structured training system, 11 (33.3%) a moderately-structured training system, and 9 (27.3%) a well-structured training system. Conclusion Since the last publication in 2011, ENYGO was able to implement new activities, workshops, and online education to support training of gynaecological oncology fellows, which were all rated by the respondents as highly useful. This survey also reveals the limitations in establishing more accredited centers, centralized cancer care, and the lack of laparoscopic training. © 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved
Similar works
Full text
Available Versions
Pergamos : Unified Institutional Repository / Digital Library Platform of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
See this paper in CORE
Go to the repository landing page
Download from data provider
oai:lib.uoa.gr:uoadl:3102617
Last time updated on 10/02/2023