Variability of the African Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) crests during year 2013

Abstract

This paper discusses the variability of the position and magnitude of the crests of African Equatorial Ionization Anomaly during noon and post sunset periods. Total electron content data covered the year 2013, and were obtained from a chain of global positioning system receivers in both hemispheres around 37°E longitude. Local magnetometer data were used to infer the direction and magnitude of the E × B drift, while the solar extreme ultraviolet proxy index was used as a measure of solar activity. It was found that the time of formation of both crests varied from 1400 to 1700 local time. Additionally, the position of the crests was found to be asymmetric with respect to the magnetic equator. During the noon period, the position of the northern and southern crests varied from 4.91° to 7.36° and −9.17° to −12.62°, respectively. During the post-sunset period, it varied from 8° to 11.7° and −9° to −16°, respectively. Seasonally, with reference to the magnetic equator, both crests moved poleward during equinoxes and collapsed towards the equator during winter and summer. Equinoxes recorded the greatest crest magnitude followed by winter then summer over both hemispheres during the noon period. However, this trend persisted over the northern crest only during the post-sunset period. Overall, during the noon period, we recorded correlation coefficients of 0.67 and 0.68 between crest magnitudes and ΔH, a proxy for equatorial electrojet current, and 0.88 and 0.81 between crest positions and ΔH, for the northern and southern crests, respectively. During the Halloween day storm of 30 October 2013, a westward electric field inhibited the development of the post-sunset crests.The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author

    Similar works