U radu se analizira pravno uređenje poništavanja i ukidanja nezakonitog
rješenja u Zakonu o općem upravnom postupku. Poništavanje i ukidanje
nezakonitog rješenja je izvanredno pravno sredstvo koje je (iako pod različitim
nazivima) u normiranju općeg upravnog postupka u Hrvatskoj neprekidno
prisutno skoro jedno stoljeće. Svoje korijene ima još u Zakonu o općem
upravnom postupku iz 1930. Tijekom navedenoga razdoblja institut je mijenjan,
ali je uvijek imao snažna autoritativna i ofi ciozna obilježja. U radu će se
pokušati odgovoriti na osnovna pitanja koja nameće važeće pravno uređenje
poništavanja i ukidanja nezakonitoga rješenja u Zakonu o općem upravnom
postupku. U tu svrhu, najprije se ukratko prikazuje pozitivno-pravno (de lege
lata) uređenje instituta, te se nakon toga, ukazuje na potrebu unaprjeđivanja
instituta te ističu de lege ferenda prijedlozi. U radu se upućuje i na povijesni
razvoj instituta u hrvatskom pravu te na pojedina odabrana poredbeno-pravna
rješenja.The paper analyses the legal regulation of annulment and revocation of an
unlawful decision in the General Administrative Procedure Act. Annulment and
revocation of an unlawful decision is an extraordinary legal remedy that (albeit
under different names) has been continuously present in the norming of the general
administrative procedure in Croatia for almost a century. It has its roots in the General
Administrative Procedure Act from 1930. During the mentioned period, the institute
was changed, but it had always had strong authoritative and offi cial features. In this
paper, we will try to answer the basic questions imposed by the valid legal regulation
of the annulment and revocation of unlawful decisions in the General Administrative
Procedure Act. For this purpose, the positive-legal (de lege lata) organization of the
institute is briefl y presented at fi rst, followed by the need to modernize the institute
and the de lege ferenda proposals. The paper also refers to the historical development
of the institute in Croatian law and to some selected comparative legal solutions