Awad, Noor

Bergman, Edward

Bischl, Bernd

Eggensperger, Katharina

Feurer, Matthias

Hutter, Frank

Pechenizkiy, Mykola

Pfisterer, Florian

Vanschoren, Joaquin

Weerts, Hilde

English

The field of automated machine learning (AutoML) introduces techniques that automate parts of the development of machine learning (ML) systems, accelerating the process and reducing barriers for novices. However, decisions derived from ML models can reproduce, amplify, or even introduce unfairness in our societies, causing harm to (groups of) individuals. In response, researchers have started to propose AutoML systems that jointly optimize fairness and predictive performance to mitigate fairness-related harm. However, fairness is a complex and inherently interdisciplinary subject, and solely posing it as an optimization problem can have adverse side effects. With this work, we aim to raise awareness among developers of AutoML systems about such limitations of fairness-aware AutoML, while also calling attention to the potential of AutoML as a tool for fairness research. We present a comprehensive overview of different ways in which fairness-related harm can arise and the ensuing implications for the design of fairness-aware AutoML. We conclude that while fairness cannot be automated, fairness-aware AutoML can play an important role in the toolbox of an ML practitioner. We highlight several open technical challenges for future work in this direction. Additionally, we advocate for the creation of more user-centered assistive systems designed to tackle challenges encountered in fairness work

Pure OAI Repository

Can Fairness be Automated?:Guidelines and Opportunities for Fairness-aware AutoML

https://pure.tue.nl/ws/files/300607711/2303.08485v1.pdf

Can Fairness be Automated?:Guidelines and Opportunities for Fairness-aware AutoML

Abstract

Similar works

Full text

Available Versions

Pure OAI Repository